> I read the example with great interest, but I don't understand why "3
> Web2Py instances, one XML configuration" is better than multiple
> configuration files. I'm not saying it's not better, I just really
> don't understand it.
>
> It would seem that either way, one still has 3 uwsgi instances
I read the example with great interest, but I don't understand why "3
Web2Py instances, one XML configuration" is better than multiple
configuration files. I'm not saying it's not better, I just really
don't understand it.
It would seem that either way, one still has 3 uwsgi instances and 3
web2p
> Hi Roberto,
>
> I can use this setting in version 0.9.5?
>
> José
>
Hi, yesterday the 0.9.6 version has been released
--
Roberto De Ioris
http://unbit.it
Hi Roberto,
I can use this setting in version 0.9.5?
José
> thanks. Some users have experience dropped requests with uWSGI on
> heavy traffic. Can you reproduce the problem?
Never had specific report about this (socket misconfiguration apart), they
should post relevant data to the uWSGI mailing-list.
uWSGI will never take down your machine if the load
thanks. Some users have experience dropped requests with uWSGI on
heavy traffic. Can you reproduce the problem?
On Aug 26, 11:32 pm, Roberto De Ioris wrote:
> Hi all, we have added a section in our "examples" wiki page for
> web2py:
>
> http://projects.unbit.it/uwsgi/wiki/Example
>
> I hope this
-
(please do not get too excited about the next lines)
-
no way ;-)
tks.
Niphlod
7 matches
Mail list logo
