[web2py] Re: switch to python 3

2016-12-09 Thread Massimo Di Pierro
Very interested. In fact I recently made this: http://iotcallme.com/ (still experimental) Massimo On Wednesday, 7 December 2016 06:48:45 UTC-6, dlypka wrote: > > I propose a new framework: > things2py > (Massimo might guess what I am talking about - think hardware and the "T" > in IoT). > I hav

[web2py] Re: switch to python 3

2016-12-07 Thread dlypka
I propose a new framework: things2py (Massimo might guess what I am talking about - think hardware and the "T" in IoT). I have bit of code that could jump start it On Friday, November 4, 2016 at 10:34:55 PM UTC-4, saeed mehrabi wrote: > > Hello > When do you want to switch to python 3? > I am wai

Re: [web2py] Re: switch to python 3

2016-12-06 Thread Niphlod
as I said, definitely not stable nor released. On Tuesday, December 6, 2016 at 7:34:09 PM UTC+1, Paolo Valleri wrote: > > What about https://gitlab.com/m2crypto/m2crypto/commits/python3 ? > > > On Monday, December 5, 2016 at 9:57:19 PM UTC+1, Niphlod wrote: >> >> m2crypto port for py3 are availabl

Re: [web2py] Re: switch to python 3

2016-12-06 Thread Paolo Valleri
What about https://gitlab.com/m2crypto/m2crypto/commits/python3 ? On Monday, December 5, 2016 at 9:57:19 PM UTC+1, Niphlod wrote: > > m2crypto port for py3 are available (although not strictly official). > The contrib module for x509 auth stands on it so, on py3, it MAY not work, > but it's not

Re: [web2py] Re: switch to python 3

2016-12-05 Thread Niphlod
m2crypto port for py3 are available (although not strictly official). The contrib module for x509 auth stands on it so, on py3, it MAY not work, but it's not web2py's fault (BTW, if you have an alternative, that works for py2 and py3 we'll be glad to adopt it) On Monday, December 5, 2016 at 1:

Re: [web2py] Re: switch to python 3

2016-12-04 Thread Jason Solack
Does not having m2crypto mean auth is less secure or does it just effect x509 authentication? On Sunday, November 6, 2016 at 2:15:08 PM UTC-5, Niphlod wrote: > > the same gain moving any piece of code from python 2 to python 3 (read on > the interwebs, there are a few). > at least now you can c

Re: [web2py] Re: switch to python 3

2016-11-06 Thread Niphlod
the same gain moving any piece of code from python 2 to python 3 (read on the interwebs, there are a few). at least now you can choose and have web2py not standing in the way. On Sunday, November 6, 2016 at 12:34:39 AM UTC+1, Ramos wrote: > > what is the gain moving to python 3? > > 2016-11-05 17

Re: [web2py] Re: switch to python 3

2016-11-05 Thread António Ramos
what is the gain moving to python 3? 2016-11-05 17:59 GMT+00:00 Leonel Câmara : > web2py is almost completely python 3 compatible. You can follow the issue > here: https://github.com/web2py/web2py/issues/1353 > > -- > Resources: > - http://web2py.com > - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) > -

[web2py] Re: switch to python 3

2016-11-05 Thread Leonel Câmara
web2py is almost completely python 3 compatible. You can follow the issue here: https://github.com/web2py/web2py/issues/1353 -- Resources: - http://web2py.com - http://web2py.com/book (Documentation) - http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code) - https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (