k, got it, thank you so much Anthony for detail explaination.
best regards,
stifan
--
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
---
You received this mess
You are right. It is not documented, but with _after_insert, the
f.fieldname notation does work with a regular insert but not with
bulk_insert. It also does not work with _before_insert. I'm not sure why
the inconsistency, but it is probably best to stick with the documented
method using f['fie
yes, you all right, in the past i learned the after_insert callback can be
access via f.amount, yet it still work when using insert, but not
bulk_insert (must use dict f['amount'] ), please correct me if i'm wrong
about my conclusion
thanks and best regards,
stifan
On Thursday, April 21, 2016
On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 1:57:20 AM UTC-4, 黄祥 wrote:
>
> meet strange behaviour in after_insert callback, when using variable (e.g.
> f.amount) is not work, but when using dict (e.g. f['amount'] ) work
> models/db_wizard_4_subscription.py
> # not work
> def __after_insert_subscription_detail
tried with f['amount']yet ?
On Thursday, April 21, 2016 at 7:57:20 AM UTC+2, 黄祥 wrote:
>
> meet strange behaviour in after_insert callback, when using variable (e.g.
> f.amount) is not work, but when using dict (e.g. f['amount'] ) work
> models/db_wizard_4_subscription.py
> # not work
> def __aft
5 matches
Mail list logo
