yes, i just ran the script from web2py's github repository and used the
setting it provide... it was faster and more stable.
On Sunday, April 17, 2016 at 9:34:40 PM UTC-4, kenny c wrote:
>
> was nignx faster than running on Apache as default setting?
--
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://
was nignx faster than running on Apache as default setting?
--
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
---
You received this message because you are sub
interesting. How did you run the test on Apache and share us how you did tweak
apache setting to boost the performance?
--
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Repor
Quick update on this... I ran the same test with nginx on aws and that works as
expected... So I strongly suspect a setting or settings in Apache being the
issue
--
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https://
No database. I took out all the model files. I am just iterating through some
lists then sleeping for 5 seconds.
--
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issue
On Wednesday, April 13, 2016 at 1:35:10 PM UTC-7, Jason Solack wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
> I have set up a simple site on aws to test concurrent requests and it
> appears i'm getting requests answered sequentially...
>
> https://52.207.216.107/ServerTest/default/index
>
> I essentially ran the ub
6 matches
Mail list logo