+1
On Sep 22, 3:35 pm, pbreit wrote:
> I would hate for energy spent on some sort of version 3 to take away from
> energy that could go in to Web2py. And I think Massimo had some more radical
> ideas for a next gen framework beyond just porting Web2py to Python3. Like
> starting out with somethin
I would hate for energy spent on some sort of version 3 to take away from
energy that could go in to Web2py. And I think Massimo had some more radical
ideas for a next gen framework beyond just porting Web2py to Python3. Like
starting out with something like Bottle.
My guess is it's still a bit
I am talking about python 3 more because there will be a pypy version
supporting python 3, and numpy, and greenlets, c extensions :)
Is there still performance issues with Python 3? Last time I checked it ran
about 25% slower than Python 2.
>
> the main snag is DB drivers, e.g.pyodbc for python 3 is just in beta
pure python drivers already support python 3 (at least using translation
tool)
sqlite is builtin
postgreesql
http://python.projects.postgresql.org/
mysql
- pymysql
- myconnpy https://launchpad.net/myconnpy
and if pyodb
Nothing wrong with planning but the main snag is DB drivers, e.g.
pyodbc for python 3 is just in beta.
On Sep 22, 6:35 am, Vasile Ermicioi wrote:
> yes I read different discussion about,
> and my propose is to START it
> - planning
> - steps
>
> so when pypy 3 will be released, also a web3py w
yes I read different discussion about,
and my propose is to START it
- planning
- steps
so when pypy 3 will be released, also a web3py will be released
they plan to complete it till 1st March 2012
so my edited question:
what do you think to start a web3py now?
what steps should be done?
what is
Search in the group for web3py (TM)
On 22 сен, 14:09, elffikk wrote:
> why I think it is time:
> - python 3 is already in version 3.2
> - pypy will start soon a python 3 implementation
> - python 3 has many cool features (OrderedDict, all strings are
> unicode, etc), well some of them already por
8 matches
Mail list logo
