[web2py] Re: html5 test

2010-06-08 Thread Yarko Tymciurak
Ok - this link - html5test.com - has been updated, and Safari-5 is out today; Out of (now) a total possible 300 points: Safari 5.0 (6533.16): 208 + 10 bonus points; Chrome 5.0.375.70:197 + 7 bonus points; Safari 3.6.3139 + 4 Opera 10.53: 129 + 4 - Yarko

[web2py] Re: html5 test

2010-06-07 Thread Yarko Tymciurak
... I missed that this is being developed, open, by Niels: http://github.com/NielsLeenheer/html5test ...opne to contributions On Jun 7, 1:10 pm, Yarko Tymciurak wrote: > On Jun 7, 2:28 am, annet wrote: > > > Safari 4.0.5 : 115 0ut of 160 > > On OS/X 10.6.3: > > Chrome 5.0.375.55:     142 > Safa

[web2py] Re: html5 test

2010-06-07 Thread Yarko Tymciurak
On Jun 7, 2:28 am, annet wrote: > Safari 4.0.5 : 115 0ut of 160 On OS/X 10.6.3: Chrome 5.0.375.55: 142 Safari 4.0.5: 120 Opera 10.53:102 Firefox 3.6.3:101 Not sure how complete this test is (has anyone reviewed the test? - from just glancing a

[web2py] Re: html5 test

2010-06-07 Thread annet
Safari 4.0.5 : 115 0ut of 160 Failing on: Geolocation, Forms and User interaction. Annet.

[web2py] Re: html5 test

2010-06-07 Thread Anand Vaidya
rekonq and arora, which are webkit based, (tested on Linux, KDE 4.4.4) score 116/160 On Jun 7, 3:11 pm, Álvaro Justen wrote: > On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 04:10, Iceberg wrote: > > Just for your information: > >http://html5test.com/ > > > I tried these on Windows XP: > > Chrome5: 142 out of 160 > >

[web2py] Re: html5 test

2010-06-07 Thread Anand Vaidya
Firefox 3.6.4 also score 101/160, failing mostly in patented/ proprietary codec (h264 etc) support. On Jun 7, 3:11 pm, Álvaro Justen wrote: > On Mon, Jun 7, 2010 at 04:10, Iceberg wrote: > > Just for your information: > >http://html5test.com/ > > > I tried these on Windows XP: > > Chrome5: 142