I can't talk about providers in general, but I do run a small hosting
company. This is all from our experience, which might or might not be
representative.
In shared hosting world, we really need to keep things locked down as much
as possible. It's a jungle out there. There is really no sane wa
On Feb 20, 2011, at 11:08 AM, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
>
> The local install may require virtualenv or gcc which may not be
> available and require root permission.
It may not be possible, I suppose, but that's a different matter than the host
forbidding it.
>
> On Feb 20, 10:32 am, Jonathan L
The local install may require virtualenv or gcc which may not be
available and require root permission.
On Feb 20, 10:32 am, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> On Feb 20, 2011, at 8:08 AM, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
>
>
>
> > I also have made this case but when it was brought up for discussion
> > NOBODY sp
On Feb 20, 2011, at 8:08 AM, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
>
> I also have made this case but when it was brought up for discussion
> NOBODY spoke in favor of keeping 2.4 compatibility.
>
> Is yours a general statement or is 2.4 critical for you specifically?
>
> On Feb 20, 6:55 am, LightDot wrote:
I also have made this case but when it was brought up for discussion
NOBODY spoke in favor of keeping 2.4 compatibility.
Is yours a general statement or is 2.4 critical for you specifically?
On Feb 20, 6:55 am, LightDot wrote:
> There is a bunch of shared hosting providers that still use RHEL/Ce
There is a bunch of shared hosting providers that still use RHEL/CentOS 5
and have not upgraded python nor they wish to - that's the point of having
RHEL/CentOS. You don't manually upgrade or add things.
And on most shared hosting providers you can't install your own version of
python. Trying w
On Feb 20, 6:18 am, Sven1011 wrote:
> But I wanted to run the framework on centos 5, hence I stuck with 2.4.
If GCC is available, you can build your own version of Python and
install into ~/local. This slice has info for doing that, and
installing other dependencies:
http://web2pyslices.com/mai
Thank you. This fix will make it in 1.92.2 since we 1.92.* should
support 2.4, but 1.93.* will no longer run on 2.4.
We had a thread about it and not one person spoke in favor of
supporting 2.4.
On Feb 19, 10:18 pm, Sven1011 wrote:
> I have downloaded the latest version of web2py and found that s
8 matches
Mail list logo
