>
> I guess I could cache it at the controller level. But the incoming url is
> like "scheme://app/control/func/subfunc?vars...". So I guess I'd parse it
> at the controller level and then apply caching only for
> "func/subfunc?vars..." which is the json-returning part. I've not really
> us
I developed a widget pattern that resembles the Auth class. It returns a
dictionary when you create at the controller level. During the first
creation of the widget (which is in a module) it builds structure and
passes it out in a dict() to make the page. Later when Ajax is called it
bypasse
By the way, why do you want to use cache.action for a non-action? Even if
this is an Ajax request, can't you still decorate the action that receives
the request? If you only want to cache part of the generated response, then
why not just use current.cache.ram, etc.?
Anthony
On Wednesday, Augus
Sorry, didn't realize you were trying to decorate a method. cache.action is
designed to cache controller actions, so it is not expecting to decorate
any functions that take arguments (methods always take at least the self
argument).
On Wednesday, August 1, 2018 at 4:27:02 AM UTC-4, Joe Barnhart
Ah, well. It seems a bit beyond me. I think it's failing because I'm
caching a bound instance method (i.e. has "self"). I get "wrapped+_f takes
no arguments, 1 given)".
def lazy_cache_action(time_expire=DEFAULT_TIME_EXPIRE, cache_model=None,
prefix=None, session=False, vars=True, l
Oops, I meant of course;
current.cache.action
instead of
current.cache
On Wednesday, August 1, 2018 at 12:48:00 AM UTC-7, Joe Barnhart wrote:
>
> You're a fountain of ideas! I missed that one in the book.
>
> I wonder if this would work. Off to go try it...
>
> def lazy_cache_action(self,
You're a fountain of ideas! I missed that one in the book.
I wonder if this would work. Off to go try it...
def lazy_cache_action(self, time_expire=DEFAULT_TIME_EXPIRE,
cache_model=None,
prefix=None, session=False, vars=True, lang=True,
user_agent=False, public=True, vali
On Tuesday, July 31, 2018 at 1:57:46 AM UTC-4, Joe Barnhart wrote:
>
> I was wondering about this. I tried to search the group but didn't find
> anything relevant. Took a look at the source code and it seemed like I
> could use in a module which is called to produce a string of Javascript on
>
8 matches
Mail list logo
