OK, thanks.
Can you comment on the performance of virtual fields in general?
{{=item.currency_symbol()}}
I have serious doubt there is any speed up in making this virtual
field lazy. I think it will be slower.
On Mar 16, 6:47 pm, pbreit wrote:
> I am trying to use lazy virtual fields and cannot seem to get it to work.
> The non-lazy virtual fields work OK.
>
> Also, can
I'll if I found time for that :-)
On júl. 26, 12:14, mdipierro wrote:
> I completely missed this thread. I think this is fixed now. Can
> somebody try it?
>
> On Jun 29, 1:25 am, szimszon wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Can I help or do something to track it down?
>
> > On jún. 28, 20:52, szimszon wro
I completely missed this thread. I think this is fixed now. Can
somebody try it?
On Jun 29, 1:25 am, szimszon wrote:
> Can I help or do something to track it down?
>
> On jún. 28, 20:52, szimszon wrote:
>
> > The virtualfields class is not a common python class?
>
> > On jún. 28, 09:35, szimszon
Can I help or do something to track it down?
On jún. 28, 20:52, szimszon wrote:
> The virtualfields class is not a common python class?
>
> On jún. 28, 09:35, szimszon wrote:
>
> > That's weired why is this working:
>
> > class web_sites_extra():
> > def servername( self ):
> > return self
The virtualfields class is not a common python class?
On jún. 28, 09:35, szimszon wrote:
> That's weired why is this working:
>
> class web_sites_extra():
> def servername( self ):
> return self.web_sites.txt.split()
>
> and this not:
>
> class web_sites_extra():
> def servername( self ):
That's weired why is this working:
class web_sites_extra():
def servername( self ):
return self.web_sites.txt.split()
and this not:
class web_sites_extra():
def servername( self ):
r=self.web_sites.txt.split()
return self.web_sites.txt.split()
or this:
class web_sites_extra():
7 matches
Mail list logo
