I study a bit each of your demo app, and they pretty much use a similar
approach.
So for making test execution under web2py environnement, I think we are
fine...
I see flaw in mocking inside web2py (Niphold as some kind of mocking
functions), I guess a default mocking module python file could be
Hi guys.
I've been too busy in the past months and I couldn't focus on web2py.test.
I'm planning to getting back to it next month.
On Wed, 18 Feb 2015 17:25:11 -0300 Niphlod wrote
>the idea behind the project was to have BDD done. Vinicius was covering
>already unittesting. IMHO we
Thanks Mark,
I like pytest, it is pretty flexible...
Richard
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Mark Graves wrote:
> You may also consider pytest bdd.
>
> Its a pytest plugin that brings in BDD gherkin syntax and executable
> specifications.
>
> A nice complement/alternative to behave.
>
>
> On
You may also consider pytest bdd.
Its a pytest plugin that brings in BDD gherkin syntax and executable
specifications.
A nice complement/alternative to behave.
On Thursday, February 19, 2015 at 9:29:19 AM UTC-6, Richard wrote:
>
> Thanks!
>
> You maybe right about TDD being less applicable web
Thanks!
You maybe right about TDD being less applicable web app... At least in case
of controller, for subfunction though input values can be mocked in case of
a compute function or a represent function... But doctest maybe enough for
that kind of testing...
Richard
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 3:25
the idea behind the project was to have BDD done. Vinicius was covering
already unittesting. IMHO web applications (or, at least, the ones I code)
rely on too many pieces you can't test without a live browser. Once that
concept sinks in, you'll quickly realize that unittesting is too limited
wh
Hello Niphold,
What is the advantage of Behave over Lettuce or other (or why you choose
Behave)?
You didn't implement Unit test, is it because Vinicius already demonstrate
it or because other consideration?
Thanks
Richard
On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Niphlod wrote:
> first to the party
first to the party, latest to the thread.
https://github.com/niphlod/welcome_augmented
--
Resources:
- http://web2py.com
- http://web2py.com/book (Documentation)
- http://github.com/web2py/web2py (Source code)
- https://code.google.com/p/web2py/issues/list (Report Issues)
---
You received this
James,
Thank you for bringing up this very important issue.
I have been setting up a continuous integration environment using open
source software (Jenkins) as well as some tutorials, in the manner of the
ruby koans package.
If you're interested, there are 3 repos right now (They are very ro
On Wednesday, February 11, 2015 at 5:20:28 AM UTC-8, James O' Driscoll
wrote:
>
> All.
>
> I have not been receiving any feedback with regards testing.
>
You might want to check over on web2py-developers, if the book isn't any
help.
http://web2py.com/books/default/chapter/29/15/helping-web2py
All.
I have not been receiving any feedback with regards testing.
So are no tests available for key functions supplied with web2py, i.e.
appadmin.
If this is the case, it is a definite downside to the framework.
Regards,
James
On Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 1:10:31 PM UTC+10, James O' Drisc
11 matches
Mail list logo
