me neither. Lately I try to assume the fact that something is stable only
if it's tested. If it isn't, then it may change in a while, so I don't
write code depending on it. Fortunately as_json() is not documented in the
book (hence "experimental" at least in theory) but I'd argue that someone
b
It does look like a significant change was made to Row.as_json --
previously it did pull the items out of _extra, but now leaves _extra in
place. Not sure why.
Anthony
On Wednesday, June 4, 2014 6:34:35 AM UTC-4, Niphlod wrote:
>
> Does this mean that your code relied on rows.json() and now the
BTW: I think that if you download the latest version (i.e., the latest
source code) you'd have no issues with SQLTABLE because of a patch has been
included for it on 2014-04-24.
On Wednesday, June 4, 2014 12:34:35 PM UTC+2, Niphlod wrote:
>
> Does this mean that your code relied on rows.json() a
Does this mean that your code relied on rows.json() and now the output is
different ?
In other words: can you please state what your application needs from 2.5.1
to work and doesn't with 2.9.5 ?
Did you try with the trunk version ?
On Wednesday, June 4, 2014 11:13:17 AM UTC+2, Massimiliano wrot
I think that is the problem.
Data from rows.json()
Look at the data structure:
version 2.5.1
u'[{"SUM(qviewriepilogoprevisioni.motrici)": 0, "zona": "ABRUZZO",
"SUM(qviewriepilogoprevisioni.bilici)": 2,
"SUM(qviewriepilogoprevisioni.abbinati)": 0, "tratta": "ASCOLI (Ascoli
Piceno)"}, {"SUM(qvie
I don't know what to suggest unless you show some code.
On Wednesday, June 4, 2014 10:23:29 AM UTC+2, Massimiliano wrote:
>
> I think I explained the problem in the wrong way.
>
> Before, with the old version of web2py some procedures that make use of
> datatable worked very well.
> Today we miss
I think I explained the problem in the wrong way.
Before, with the old version of web2py some procedures that make use of
datatable worked very well.
Today we miss some fields... aggregate fields.
So I was looking for an hint to make the system work again with little
effort :D
Thank you
On Tue
it's not a problem. we just changed the way a Rows class gets represented
(printing resultsets with 1k rows was kynda lame ^_^)
if you do
print rows
things "change", but
for row in rows:
print row
doesn't change a bit.
On Tuesday, June 3, 2014 12:53:08 PM UTC+2, Massimiliano wrote:
>
>
8 matches
Mail list logo
