[web2py] Re: Strange behavior with firefox II

2010-01-20 Thread Jose
On 21 ene, 01:48, mdipierro wrote: > No idea. I chose to create three different controllers and simplify the code. Thanks. Jose -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "web2py-users" group. To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com. To

[web2py] Re: Strange behavior with firefox II

2010-01-20 Thread mdipierro
No idea. On Jan 20, 5:32 pm, Jose wrote: > On 20 ene, 23:14, mdipierro wrote: > > > I see two issues: > > > 1) proximo should domicilio not domicilio2 > > In the mail is wrong, because I had been trying something. But really > is this: proximo = 'domicilio' > > > > > 2) does you custom view disp

[web2py] Re: Strange behavior with firefox II

2010-01-20 Thread Jose
On 20 ene, 23:14, mdipierro wrote: > I see two issues: > > 1) proximo should domicilio not domicilio2 In the mail is wrong, because I had been trying something. But really is this: proximo = 'domicilio' > > 2) does you custom view displays all fields in form? I do not understand the question,

[web2py] Re: Strange behavior with firefox II

2010-01-20 Thread mdipierro
I see two issues: 1) proximo should domicilio not domicilio2 2) does you custom view displays all fields in form? Massimo On Jan 20, 4:58 pm, Jose wrote: > On 20 ene, 22:21, mdipierro wrote:> Sorry I do not > understand the workflow here. You seem to say > > domicilio1 and domicilio2 are tw

[web2py] Re: Strange behavior with firefox II

2010-01-20 Thread Jose
On 20 ene, 22:21, mdipierro wrote: > Sorry I do not understand the workflow here. You seem to say > domicilio1 and domicilio2 are two actions but you show us only one > (domicilio). > > Any chance you can isolate the problem in smaller actions? > This starts to be a lot of code to look over. > >

[web2py] Re: Strange behavior with firefox II

2010-01-20 Thread mdipierro
Sorry I do not understand the workflow here. You seem to say domicilio1 and domicilio2 are two actions but you show us only one (domicilio). Any chance you can isolate the problem in smaller actions? This starts to be a lot of code to look over. Massimo On Jan 20, 4:07 pm, Jose wrote: > Returni