Re: [web2py] Re: Status of workflow functionality

2015-02-12 Thread Anthony
No commits for the past year. On Thursday, February 12, 2015 at 4:41:12 PM UTC-5, Richard wrote: > > Anyone know if SpiffWorflow is fonded in any way? Is it backed by big > player? > > Richard > > On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:25 AM, dlypka wrote: > >> Workflow typically stores its state in very co

Re: [web2py] Re: Status of workflow functionality

2015-02-12 Thread Richard Vézina
Anyone know if SpiffWorflow is fonded in any way? Is it backed by big player? Richard On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 10:25 AM, dlypka wrote: > Workflow typically stores its state in very complex sql tables. > If something goes wrong the tables are easily corrupted and then it is > very hard to fix. (b

Re: [web2py] Re: Status of workflow functionality

2013-03-12 Thread dlypka
Workflow typically stores its state in very complex sql tables. If something goes wrong the tables are easily corrupted and then it is very hard to fix. (brittle) Also if the table design evolves, it is hard to migrate. This is my experience with Microsoft Workflow for Windows. I believe an entit

Re: [web2py] Re: Status of workflow functionality

2013-03-12 Thread António Ramos
If i knew howto and have time i would create a workflow as a service. This way i centralize all my rules for every app in a single app. If i have 40 apps in my company it would be easy to manage all rules from all apps. Is this a good way to go? 2013/3/12 Cliff Kachinske > Workflow is not a

[web2py] Re: Status of workflow functionality

2013-03-11 Thread Cliff Kachinske
Workflow is not a winning proposition. If you're working with a small business they can't afford the t time it takes to do a decent job. If it's a large company they can afford a big time solution with all the bells and whistles. It's too ready to get tied up in the rocket science that the fu

[web2py] Re: Status of workflow functionality

2013-03-11 Thread Niphlod
minimal https://github.com/oxplot/fysom supercomplete https://github.com/knipknap/SpiffWorkflow I don't think that with all the solutions out there there is still to reinvent another module for it. On Monday, March 11, 2013 11:53:12 PM UTC+1, Timmie wrote: > > Hello, > what is the current s