[web2py] Re: Squid caching, processor load balancing (via Cubicweb)

2011-03-15 Thread Anthony
FYI, Nginx + uWSGI is what DotCloud uses for its Python hosting (HAProxy for load balancing): http://docs.dotcloud.com/components/python/ On Tuesday, March 15, 2011 3:11:53 PM UTC-4, pbreit wrote: > I just switched from Cherokee to Nginx but have not investigated load > balancing yet. Is Rocket

[web2py] Re: Squid caching, processor load balancing (via Cubicweb)

2011-03-15 Thread pbreit
I just switched from Cherokee to Nginx but have not investigated load balancing yet. Is Rocket necessary? I have a Nginx/uWSGI setup. I posted my install Fabfile on another thread.

[web2py] Re: Squid caching, processor load balancing (via Cubicweb)

2011-03-15 Thread Massimo Di Pierro
web2py user Jay at PyCon really convinced to look into nginex. It is an amazing server, fast, easy to configure and can do load balancing: http://wiki.nginx.org/NginxHttpUpstreamModule Just start multiple web2py instances with rocket (on the same machine or different machines) and add to the ngine

[web2py] Re: Squid caching, processor load balancing (via Cubicweb)

2011-03-15 Thread pbreit
Isn't load balancing usually handle by the web server or a load balancer? Can the framework really address load balancing effectively? Would be cool if it could, of course.

[web2py] Re: Squid caching, processor load balancing (via Cubicweb)

2011-03-15 Thread VP
Feature-wise, web2py is pretty complete. I think the next milestones of web2py should be on performance and scalability; (web2py is reaching 2.0 sooner or later, right?) I would like to see stronger built-in support for smart caching and load balancing (distributing work across different servers)