I just wanted to clear something up, I don't mean any disrespect to
django users.
I am referring to the time when web2py vs django comparison was
editable, there were many django users who would edit it and deface
it.
And we also know about those same django users trying to get web2py
flagged is
On Feb 9, 2010, at 4:52 PM, Thadeus Burgess wrote:
> No anonymous edits... Django fanboys will deface it within minutes of
> it going up
I think that's best. Wikipedia expends an awful lot of effort cleaning up after
defacers.
>
> -Thadeus
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Maria
No anonymous edits... Django fanboys will deface it within minutes of
it going up
-Thadeus
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 6:36 PM, Mariano Reingart wrote:
> Things already fixed:
> - No anonymous edits, but changed
> @auth.requires_membership('developer') to requires_login()
> - Fixed create_page bu
Things already fixed:
- No anonymous edits, but changed
@auth.requires_membership('developer') to requires_login()
- Fixed create_page bug
- Full internationalization
- Spanish translation
Denes is working on more radical changes, and I'm working on timeline,
wyswyg & pdf output.
On Tue, Feb 9, 2
what kind of changes are you making? I read some reports about login
problems, so do you think its worth allowing anonymous edits, like
wikipedia permits?
On Feb 10, 2:01 am, DenesL wrote:
> BTW I am working on improving the web2py wiki app, maybe it will be
> done today.
>
> On Feb 8, 11:43 pm,
denesL: looking very much forward to that, hope i can also use it to
document my own code with it
On 9 Feb., 16:01, DenesL wrote:
> BTW I am working on improving the web2py wiki app, maybe it will be
> done today.
>
> On Feb 8, 11:43 pm, Mariano Reingart wrote:
>
>
>
> > For the web2py spanish d
BTW I am working on improving the web2py wiki app, maybe it will be
done today.
On Feb 8, 11:43 pm, Mariano Reingart wrote:
> For the web2py spanish documentation wiki (btw using web2py-wiki) we
> are working in several features, including wyswyg editing and pdf
> output, to organize and transla
All those that think Massimo is either, 1. A total stud or 2. Freaking
amazing. +1 Your a great guy Massimo.
---
Warmest Regards,
Jason Brower
On Tue, 2010-02-09 at 06:36 -0800, mdipierro wrote:
> Alexandre is right except this part is now partially solved.
> None of the tools suggested here wor
Alexandre is right except this part is now partially solved.
None of the tools suggested here worked in converting my Latex to wiki
but I only used my own Latex macros so I stayed awake last night and
wrote my own tool (works only with my own latex but works much better
than anything else). I am le
I suggest to look at
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py/msg/8bc0309e26c0cb84
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
web2py+u
I suggest to see
http://groups.google.com/group/web2py/msg/8bc0309e26c0cb84
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"web2py-users" group.
To post to this group, send email to web...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
web2py+unsub
Well,
I never discuss about my clients needs. I just understand it and make the
specification.
1. Documentation about web2py is poor. Everyone agree.
2. One reason for this is Massimo defines the new versions, and there is no
roadmap. New features are added 'ad hoc'
3. Since Massimo decides what w
For the web2py spanish documentation wiki (btw using web2py-wiki) we
are working in several features, including wyswyg editing and pdf
output, to organize and translate some kind of manual (and other minor
updates to make the wiki more user friendly).
To convert html to reST, using html2rst.py see
On Feb 9, 11:58 am, mdipierro wrote:
> I am not sure this is something people should vote on.
to clarify, I wasn't calling for a vote on what to do with the manual
- I acknowledge it is your IP. But ideas and feedback might be helpful.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to
Perhaps the wiki should be in latex. ;-)
On Feb 8, 7:43 pm, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> On Feb 8, 2010, at 5:33 PM, mdipierro wrote:
>
> > I just tried pandoc (latex->rst>latex) and I end up with something
> > that does not look at all like the original.
>
> It's the Second Law of Thermodynamics. L
On Feb 8, 2010, at 5:33 PM, mdipierro wrote:
> I just tried pandoc (latex->rst>latex) and I end up with something
> that does not look at all like the original.
It's the Second Law of Thermodynamics. Latex and rst (or html) are not
equivalent, and conversions in either direction are lossy (unles
I just tried pandoc (latex->rst>latex) and I end up with something
that does not look at all like the original.
On Feb 8, 7:22 pm, Jonathan Lundell wrote:
> On Feb 8, 2010, at 4:58 PM, mdipierro wrote:
>
> > If people know of a good tool to convert latex to wiki format and vice
> > versa, I co
On Feb 8, 2010, at 4:58 PM, mdipierro wrote:
> If people know of a good tool to convert latex to wiki format and vice
> versa, I could use that.
http://hutchinson.belmont.ma.us/tth/ looks like the best bet for latex to html;
you could probably get from there to wiki. Back again? I could be wrong
I am not sure this is something people should vote on.
Let me resolve some of the issues on my side first.
This should not be stopping anybody from writing howtos, examples and
tutorials.
this is complementary and putting everything together is a secondary
step.
If people know of a good tool to co
19 matches
Mail list logo
