IMHO ractive.js does not depend on jquery...
I just created the following and it does not require jQuery:
https://github.com/michele-comitini/ractive_chart
http://svg.soon.it/ractive-chart/html/example.html
2015-06-12 11:07 GMT+02:00 António Ramos :
> And Components..
>
> 2015-06-12 10:03 GM
And Components..
2015-06-12 10:03 GMT+01:00 António Ramos :
> Also you can add
>
> https://github.com/vuejs/vue-resource
>
> https://github.com/ayamflow/vue-route
>
> Also vuejs has Directives, filters, transitions ..
>
> 2015-06-12 10:00 GMT+01:00 António Ramos :
>
>> In VueJS!!wait-for
>>
>> An
Also you can add
https://github.com/vuejs/vue-resource
https://github.com/ayamflow/vue-route
Also vuejs has Directives, filters, transitions ..
2015-06-12 10:00 GMT+01:00 António Ramos :
> In VueJS!!wait-for
>
> An event name to wait for on the incoming child component before switching
> it wi
In VueJS!!wait-for
An event name to wait for on the incoming child component before switching
it with the current component. This allows you to wait for asynchronous
data to be loaded before triggering the transition to avoid unwanted flash
of emptiness in between.
Example:
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Not sure. It was just an impression. I noticed ractive.js depends on
jQuery. vue.js does not. the template language is the same in both
(mustache). ractive.js requires a while vue.js
acts in place (which is clever). Ractive has more example which makes me
think it may have more functionality b
Massimo
why do you call Vuejs a stripped version? what does it lack compared to
Ractive?
Thank you
António
2015-06-10 4:05 GMT+01:00 Massimo Di Pierro :
> vue.js look like a stripped version of ractive.js. The syntax is identical
> for what it provides.
>
>
> On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 16:36:49 UT
vue.js look like a stripped version of ractive.js. The syntax is identical
for what it provides.
On Tuesday, 9 June 2015 16:36:49 UTC-5, Ramos wrote:
>
> No, of course not.
>
> On the contrary, i know hate angularjs after reading about vuejs.
>
> I wish i knew it before
>
> 2015-06-09 19:58 G
No, of course not.
On the contrary, i know hate angularjs after reading about vuejs.
I wish i knew it before
2015-06-09 19:58 GMT+01:00 Dave S :
>
>
> On Tuesday, June 9, 2015 at 3:21:55 AM UTC-7, Ramos wrote:
>>
>> another one bites the dust.
>>
>>
> "bites the dust" is used for something
On Tuesday, June 9, 2015 at 3:21:55 AM UTC-7, Ramos wrote:
>
> another one bites the dust.
>
>
"bites the dust" is used for something that (or someone who) has been shot
down; a final face-plant.
Are you saying the link below is a dead tool?
> http://vuejs.org/guide/index.html
>
> the docs
Videos...
https://laracasts.com/series/learning-vuejs/episodes/1
2015-06-09 11:21 GMT+01:00 António Ramos :
> another one bites the dust.
>
> http://vuejs.org/guide/index.html
>
> the docs are very extensive
>
> 2015-06-08 17:38 GMT+01:00 Derek :
>
>> I just hate non-compliant html. I've always
another one bites the dust.
http://vuejs.org/guide/index.html
the docs are very extensive
2015-06-08 17:38 GMT+01:00 Derek :
> I just hate non-compliant html. I've always been drawn to html compliant
> templates, like TAL (Template Attribute Language).
>
> In any case, I see that it generates h
I just hate non-compliant html. I've always been drawn to html compliant
templates, like TAL (Template Attribute Language).
In any case, I see that it generates html, and it is a lot smaller than the
alternatives. I'd be willing to give this a shot.
On Monday, June 8, 2015 at 3:02:30 AM UTC-7,
12 matches
Mail list logo
