IS_IN_SET and IS_IN_DB only produce dropdown widgets when they are not
within a list of validators. The book mentions this for IS_IN_DB, but not
for IS_IN_SET.
Anthony
On Monday, November 21, 2011 9:27:35 PM UTC-5, villas wrote:
>
> After giving it a little more thought, I suppose the solution
After giving it a little more thought, I suppose the solution is to use an
onvalidation function.
However, it is still worthy of mention that something in the book does not
seem to provide an expected result.
Thanks so much, Bruno. I also found this in the manual -- I had
overlooked the fact that the zero option was available there.
Appreciate that you took the time to answer.
Eric
On Sep 1, 8:39 pm, Bruno Rocha wrote:
>
> db.define_table('plan',
> Field
On Jun 10, 2:21 pm, Ross Peoples wrote:
> I'm sure you've already considered this, but maybe use a checkbox instead,
yes but this is a question of style an readability, radioboxes with
text are just far more descriptive an a single small checkbox
> as it's specifically designed to handle true/fa
I'm sure you've already considered this, but maybe use a checkbox instead,
as it's specifically designed to handle true/false. The SELECT widget and
associated IS_IN_SET is designed to return a string value. So If you really
want to use a select box for this instead of a checkbox, then you need
You should use IS_IN_DB for this
IS_IN_DB(db(optional_subquery),table.field,"optional representation")
Because you do not want to create the set at every request even if not
used. IS_IN_DB will do the query lazily.
On Dec 30, 5:41 pm, Manu wrote:
> Basically i have some research papers that i
Basically i have some research papers that i would like to access from
my web2py application. Each paper have a title and one or many
authors. But i would like also to add keywords to these papers so that
i can quickly filter the ones i am interested in.
What i have done so far is:
db.define_table
I was mistaken. I misunderstood. I am still not sure I understand. Can
you make an example?
On Dec 30, 2:04 pm, mdipierro wrote:
> this is not currently supported.
>
> On Dec 30, 1:20 pm, Manu wrote:
>
> > Hi ,
>
> > I have a database which contains a list:string field type and a
> > requireme
Any idea how properly doing it , should i try to create a new
validator ( mixing IS_IN_SET and IS_IN_DB ) ?
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 8:04 PM, mdipierro wrote:
> this is not currently supported.
>
> On Dec 30, 1:20 pm, Manu wrote:
>> Hi ,
>>
>> I have a database which contains a list:string fi
this is not currently supported.
On Dec 30, 1:20 pm, Manu wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> I have a database which contains a list:string field type and a
> requirement to be in a set of value ( with IS_IN_SET AND multiple=True
> ) . My question is how would you dynamically generate this set( my
> categories
10 matches
Mail list logo
