I can't point you to any, you are welcome to do tests yourself. (note: this
is why i said "believe it or not")
On Thursday, March 20, 2014 6:22:20 AM UTC-7, Cliff Kachinske wrote:
>
> Derek, the conventional wisdom is connecting to a db is expensive.
>
> I'm willing to be convinced, but I need so
Derek, the conventional wisdom is connecting to a db is expensive.
I'm willing to be convinced, but I need some data. Can you point me to some?
Because if your statement is true, we could eliminate some pretty hairy
code in the DAL to support pooling.
On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 7:44:10 PM UTC
I'd say the answer to 2 is 'not really'. Believe it or not, opening and
dropping database connections is a fast operation.
On Tuesday, March 18, 2014 11:33:04 PM UTC-7, tec...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Dear Sirs,
>
>
> I understand it's possible to use databases without DAL.
> For example function in
Well, if you want to do it without the DAL, there are several options that
might just work without any additional code:
- check if specific python libs that you'll use for the db connection
already provide a similar pooling function, they might
- check if the database backend natively provides su
Hello Massimo,
Thank you for reply.
On Wednesday, March 19, 2014 7:20:27 PM UTC+5, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
>
> I am not sure about pymongo but if you use
>
> DAL('mongodb:')
>
> the dal will do pooling for you.
>
Ok, I will check this.
Actually I don't want to use pymongo only, it could a
I am not sure about pymongo but if you use
DAL('mongodb:')
the dal will do pooling for you.
On Wednesday, 19 March 2014 01:33:04 UTC-5, tec...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Dear Sirs,
>
>
> I understand it's possible to use databases without DAL.
> For example function in controller:
>
> def values(
6 matches
Mail list logo
