[web2py] Re: Behave testing question

2016-06-23 Thread Jeff Riley
I will look into that Silva. All suggestions are welcome. On Thursday, June 23, 2016 at 8:18:00 AM UTC-5, Marlysson Silva wrote: > > OFF-TOPIC > I was seeing your models and I noted that you used attributes to control > hour and date of data change, don't would be better use the auth.signature ?

[web2py] Re: Behave testing question

2016-06-23 Thread Jeff Riley
Pefect thank you so much Anthony. That worked. On Thursday, June 23, 2016 at 8:13:43 AM UTC-5, Anthony wrote: > > In your Behave specification, it looks like you have "Storm Products Inc." > as the manufacturer. However, the "manufacturer" field is a reference > field, which stores record IDs f

[web2py] Re: Behave testing question

2016-06-23 Thread Marlysson Silva
OFF-TOPIC I was seeing your models and I noted that you used attributes to control hour and date of data change, don't would be better use the auth.signature ? Em quinta-feira, 23 de junho de 2016 09:50:55 UTC-3, Jeff Riley escreveu: > > Good morning everyone. This is not really a Web2py questio

[web2py] Re: Behave testing question

2016-06-23 Thread Anthony
In your Behave specification, it looks like you have "Storm Products Inc." as the manufacturer. However, the "manufacturer" field is a reference field, which stores record IDs from the db.manufacturers table, not manufacturer names. So, in the Behave specification, the value should be the integ