rapid
succession. In the absence of this, garbage collection does seem to proceed
normally. Sorry for the confusion.
On Wednesday, April 2, 2014 4:59:43 AM UTC-5, Rick Ree wrote:
>
> Yes, the leak seems to be associated with rendering data in a view.
> On Apr 2, 2014 3:57 AM, "Pa
Ubuntu 12.04 and 13.10. I'm running web2py from the git repo, but observed
this in 2.8.2 as well.
On Tuesday, April 1, 2014 10:40:55 PM UTC-5, Massimo Di Pierro wrote:
>
> This should not be happening. What OS? What wev2py version?
>
> On Tuesday, 1 April 2014 10:00:08 UTC-
json view.
Repeated calls to this function leak memory, and I'm trying to figure out
if this is a bug in web2py. The example I gave is the simplest case that
shows the problem.
>
> On Tuesday, April 1, 2014 8:00:08 AM UTC-7, Rick Ree wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I
Hi,
If I create a new app and put a single function in default.py:
def f():
return dict(a=list(range(10)))
and then repeatedly call this using wget, e.g. wget
http://localhost:8000/default/f.html, then memory usage of web2py will
creep higher with each call. Is this a memory leak, or w
t table will not migrate but associated archive table will.
>
> If instead migrate_enabled=False, none of the tables will migrate.
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, 15 January 2013 22:09:28 UTC-6, Rick Ree wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to enable record versioning on an
Hi,
I would like to enable record versioning on an existing MySQL database in
which all tables are managed manually (migrate=False). I am concerned about
what happens if the structure of a table changes in db.define_table( ... ).
Is the associated archive table changed to match accordingly?
th
Hi,
I'm developing an application that currently uses Janrain for
authentication. I'm running an instance of the app that has a dozen users
or so. I would like to redesign the app so that it can be installed by end
users without requiring signing up with Janrain. So, I'm thinking of
switching
In case anyone else is using this, I found that 1.99.7 requires a change at
line 78:
#rows = self.select(query, ['id'], {})
rows = self.select(query, [table['id']], {})
On Monday, July 25, 2011 2:57:05 PM UTC-5, nick name wrote:
>
> Newer version attached, has been tested in one specifi
Ah, stupid me. Thanks.
On Jan 31, 8:42 am, Anthony wrote:
> Not sure if this is the problem, but it should be:
>
> IS_IN_DB(db, ...)
>
> not
>
> IS_IN_DB(db.A, ...)
>
> Anthony
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, January 31, 2012 9:11:48 AM UTC-5, Rick
I've run into a basic problem that I can't seem to figure out:
db.define_table('A', Field('name'), format='%(name)s')
db.define_table(
'B',
Field('number'),
Field('name', db.A,
requires=IS_EMPTY_OR(IS_IN_DB(db.A,'A.id','%(name)s')))
)
All I want to do is allow db.B.name
10 matches
Mail list logo