[web2py] Re: mail sending no functioning from Chrome

> What is the output? Any error message? Form is accepted? > > On febr. 26, 17:16, LBarret wrote: > > > > > This code works under FF not under Chrome (5.0.330.0 (39184) Ubuntu ). > > > > >     form = FORM( > >                LABEL("Get our monthly &

[web2py] mail sending no functioning from Chrome

This code works under FF not under Chrome (5.0.330.0 (39184) Ubuntu ). form = FORM( LABEL("Get our monthly newsletter:",_class="InputCaption", _id="NL"), INPUT(id="Email",_class="RegistrarInput",_name="email",size="25",maxlength="50",value="Enter your email here",_onfocus="th

[web2py:33213] Re: markdown wiki with web2py {{=URL(..)}} inside.

Massimo > > On Oct 20, 10:09 am, LBarret wrote: > > > I have some pages that have been written with markdown syntax. > > > I must upgrade them adding some links. > > > So far, I can only put absolute link, likehttp://www.test.com/aa/bbb. > > > But this m

[web2py:33209] markdown wiki with web2py {{=URL(..)}} inside.

I have some pages that have been written with markdown syntax. I must upgrade them adding some links. So far, I can only put absolute link, like http://www.test.com/aa/bbb. But this makes impossible to test it correctly, i.e locally without uploading the whole site. I would like to write the l

[web2py:32720] small rss2 correction. (and reload contrib question)

in rss2, because it was not working (date instead of datetime in the db), I changed the following lines (551-554) : pubDate = self.pubDate if isinstance(pubDate, datetime.datetime): pubDate = DateElement('pubDate', pubDate) _opt_element(handler, 'pubDate', pubD

[web2py:28009] Web2py views syntax in WIKI Text

The problem is writing pages easily and saving them in web2py. The easiest way to write is to use a wiki Syntax (rest, markdown, etc). The problem comes when linking pages (to dynamic part of the site for example) . Relative paths get different result on different browser and absolute paths make

[web2py:22070] Re: gzip response.

thanks everybody. I think the best practice is quite clear. On May 16, 1:26 am, Álvaro Justen [Turicas] wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 4:30 PM, AchipA wrote: > > I did a fair amount of testing on a couple of systems and the numbers > > say that in real life, it's quite a significant gain exce

[web2py:21920] gzip response.

in this thread http://groups.google.com/group/web2py/browse_thread/thread/cca9cf9e5f9176dd?pli=1, massimo said : "data should (should?) be transmitted zipped by the web server. cherrpypy's wsgiserver cannot do it but apache does it. It is not clear that there is a real benefit since it takes tim