I was calling auth.define_tables() after defining auth_user manually.
My mistake.
On Saturday, September 8, 2012 1:56:37 PM UTC-4, Joel Carrier wrote:
>
> Hmmm... i never call auth.define_tables I guess because I wanted to
> customize the auth_user table.
> And yet the following ta
Good eye Niphlod!
On Saturday, September 8, 2012 1:59:11 PM UTC-4, Joel Carrier wrote:
>
>
> Ha, as soon as I pasted this snippet I realized that and was looking to
> modify.
> When developing I was working off the trunk and having this problem.
> For some reason I thought may
ate_record but let me give it a try.
>>
>> On Saturday, 8 September 2012 12:39:20 UTC-5, Joel Carrier wrote:
>>>
>>> At first I thought it was related to running on a windows machine using
>>> the development server.
>>> Then I deployed to a linux machine
+'xxx'))
> >>> auth.enable_record_versioning(db)
> >>> print db.thing(2).modified_on
> 2012-09-08 09:22:28
> >>> db.thing(2).update_record(name='test4')
> >>> print db.thing(2).modified_on
> 2012-09-08 12:49:01
>
> Massimo
>
uth_user.
registration_id)
db.auth_user.email.requires = (
IS_EMAIL(error_message=auth.messages.invalid_email),
IS_NOT_IN_DB(db, db.auth_user.email),
IS_UPPER()
)
and in models directory i also have a z.py
auth.enable_record_versioning(db)
Do I have to update my entities using SQ
I want to maintain an audit history of all my objects.
So near the beginning of my model definition I have
db._common_fields.append(auth.signature)
and at the very end I have
auth.enable_record_versioning(db)
The problem I am having is that when I pull up all the records representing
the hist
L
> 6.2, 3.1GHz quad-core Xeon, 8GB RAM, Apache with mod_wsgi) completed 3061
> requests with a mean 0.490 seconds per request. Beefier than what AppFog
> gave me? Sure, but not enough to explain handling 22x the requests, with
> 1/22nd the response time.
>
> * The AppFog mean request fulfillment numbers varied by as much as two
> seconds over the several times I ran the tests. That sort of
> unpredictability worries me.
>
>
>
> On Thursday, July 26, 2012 9:50:01 PM UTC-4, Joel Carrier wrote:
>>
>> Has anyone tried running web2py on appfog ( www.appfog.com ) and cares
>> to comment on their experience?
>
>
--
Has anyone tried running web2py on appfog ( www.appfog.com ) and cares to
comment on their experience?
--
Hi Nick Name,
Did you ever find a solution that met all your requirements? What you've
described is exactly what I am facing now.
Joel
On Friday, May 6, 2011 6:18:49 PM UTC-4, nick name wrote:
>
> My use of web2py requires an audit trail for (essentially) all database
> tables; The preferable
9 matches
Mail list logo
