Re: SwellRT tech overview

2016-10-10 Thread Thomas Wrobel
I am sorry I didn't make the meeting, glade to see it was productive. However, I am curious though why there is questions still as to if SwellRT should be merged with wave. Wave development at apache is nearly dead. Doing nothing and it will have to retire. No one has proposed a 3rd option that I

Re: SwellRT tech overview

2016-10-10 Thread Upayavira
My concern is not for Wave, it is for SwellRT. The last thing I'd want is them (I don't know how many of them there are) to move over to Apache, only to find out that the match with Apache isn't sufficient, and Wave closes down anyway. I want to be sure we can avoid that eventuality, and the best w

Re: SwellRT tech overview

2016-10-10 Thread Adam John
Sorry to have missed you, Thomas. "Cant a date be set, a vote be taken, then either import SwellRT or not?" According to Upayavira there should be a proposal. This is what I've found: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/proposal.html Although this seems more targeted to new projects. So the proce

Re: SwellRT tech overview

2016-10-10 Thread Upayavira
I'm suggesting that before we go to the proposal phase, people just start participating in SwellRT. Just do it. Let's see what you can all accomplish over there - let SwellRT see what they have to gain, and let Apache see how more vibrant and active SwellRT is as a community. Then it will be a no-b