Re: Coming Months

Hi, I was once attending such a meeting and will do it again if it is helpful to this community. Mind to organize something via in example doodle? Cheers Christian On Tue, Mar 31, 2015, at 05:26, Evan Hughes wrote: > Hey all, > > could we get a Google hangout of the Mentors and contributors t

Re: Roadmap

Hi Kirill, glad to see your efforts on wiab.pro. On Tue, Mar 24, 2015, at 16:48, Kirill Kostyuchenko wrote: > We support our own wiab.pro instance and would be glad if Apache Wiab > placed the link to wiab.pro as a commercially supported demo-server onto > http://incubator.apache.org/wave/index.h

Actions Items (was: Roadmap)

Hi, from the huge thread "Roadmap" I took a way the following potential action items: - Client/Server split, maybe common - Setup testing - Setup CI - Replace GXP templating system - Improve buildsystem with using Maven, Gradle or SBT - Replace custom configuration framework with something

Re: Actions Items (was: Roadmap)

Build system - Actually things like GWT compilation and protobuff generation make it harder to move to another build system. Also, restructuring wave project into more standard form that maven likes to work with is imho hard. I think first we should just split Wiab into separated projects - Client/

Re: Roadmap

Andrew Kaplanov which works on wiab.pro is already an Apache Wave committer. On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:33 PM Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Hi Kirill, > > glad to see your efforts on wiab.pro. > > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015, at 16:48, Kirill Kostyuchenko wrote: > > We support our own wiab.pro instance

Re: Roadmap

Yes, but if he is coding for a company, who owns the rights, then we need an CCLA for the company which allows him to send in the code. On Tue, Mar 31, 2015, at 13:15, Yuri Z wrote: > Andrew Kaplanov which works on wiab.pro is already an Apache Wave > committer. > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:33

Re: Actions Items (was: Roadmap)

OK, understood. I think it's a psychological important step to release the code, even when its half-baked and early. If necessary, give it an alpha label. This is enough warning for most devs. I don't understand too much on the current codebase, so I can't judge what is the best first step. Separ

Re: Actions Items (was: Roadmap)

So, should I prepare a new RC from the master branch? On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 6:05 PM Christian Grobmeier wrote: > OK, understood. > > I think it's a psychological important step to release the code, even > when its half-baked and early. If necessary, give it an alpha label. > This is enough war

Discuss: Release (was: Fwd: Re: Actions Items (was: Roadmap))

Yes, I think we should do that RC now. It's a positive signal in many directions, even when we label that alpha. I have no idea how Wave currently manages it's branches. personally I work on /develop. When doing a release, I create a tag, get the release from that tag, and finally merge that into

Report re-added

Hi guys, last month Wave reported, but your mentors like me have failed to sign the report. I was asked to resubmit the report, which I did today. I also signed this report. If you have any changes for the report, you could do that now. If there is nothing more to add from your side, then you ca

waveinabox.net is online

Hi The waveinabox.net demo server is back online.

Re: Discuss: Release (was: Fwd: Re: Actions Items (was: Roadmap))

Currently we work directly on master. For release we create an RC branch that is merged back to master. The release docs are here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Release+Procedure The release procedure is under Home -> Contributing -> Release Procedure. On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:

Re: Discuss: Release (was: Fwd: Re: Actions Items (was: Roadmap))

Ok, I ll start working on a fresh RC. On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 11:00 PM Yuri Z wrote: > Currently we work directly on master. For release we create an RC branch > that is merged back to master. > The release docs are here: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Release+Procedure > The

RC7 Vote Release

RC7 is now available for review. Artifacts can be found here: *https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.7-incubating/ * (Remember checksums are from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha') The release version will

Fwd: RC7 Vote Release

RC7 is now available for review. Artifacts can be found here: *https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.7-incubating/ * (Remember checksums are from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha') The release version will

Re: Coming Months

I would also happily join. On Tue, Mar 31, 2015, at 10:24 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote: > Hi, > > I was once attending such a meeting and will do it again if it is > helpful to this community. > > Mind to organize something via in example doodle? > > Cheers > Christian > > > On Tue, Mar 31,

Re: Actions Items (was: Roadmap)

We also don’t need to publicise the release. All we are doing is demonstrating to the Incubator that we know how to do it. If we choose to, we can publicise it, or make it available, with a README that says, “This is bad code. Here’s what we’d love to do”. Now, an Apache contributor some time ago