On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Ruxiao Ma wrote:
> The computer I'm using now is Chromium 15.0.866.0 (build 98596) on Windows
> XP.
>
> My home computer is using Windows 7 with Chrome dev-channel (15.something,
> will check when I arrive home tonight). Haven't tried under Linux.
It's expected th
If thats stable and secure I'll start nagging Opera again to support
Websockets seeing as thats why they droped it [/semi-offtopic]
~~
Reviews of anything, by anyone;
www.rateoholic.co.uk
Please try out my new site and give feedback :)
On 29 August 2011 11:30, Thomas Broyer wrote:
> On Mon
Maybe we should change the default value of use.socketio fllag in
server.config to false?
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 12:30 PM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Ruxiao Ma wrote:
> > The computer I'm using now is Chromium 15.0.866.0 (build 98596) on
> Windows
> > XP.
> >
> >
If it's because of the incompatibility of different WebSockets protocol
version it won't work either...
At least, I'm running wiab with use_socketio = false today and used a clean
copy of chromium. No luck.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 19:36, Yuri Z wrote:
> Maybe we should change the default value
If so, it seems like it poses a real issue for us. Maybe we would have to
replace Socket.IO with other framework, like Comet.d.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Ruxiao Ma wrote:
> If it's because of the incompatibility of different WebSockets protocol
> version it won't work either...
>
> At lea
Seeing as I didn't have much luck picking apart the code, I could have
a go at this. At least to put more details in then there is now.
Probably need checking over after I'm done for accuracy/missing
information. (and spelling...)
Shall I sign up for the task?
-Thomas Wrobel
~~
Reviews of a
Thanks for picking this up Thomas. You can open an issue in the Wave JIRA
for this and assign it to yourself.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Thomas Wrobel wrote:
> Seeing as I didn't have much luck picking apart the code, I could have
> a go at this. At least to put more details in then there
Sure...should I categorise this as just a "TASK" or maybe a
"STORY".kinda new to all this so not sure what category this issue
would fall under. (I dread to think what gets put under "EPIC" !)
-Thomas
~~
Reviews of anything, by anyone;
www.rateoholic.co.uk
Please try out my new site and g
For the server-side code, Socket.IO-Java seems to rely on Jetty's own
implementation, so upgrading Jetty might/should be enough (would be if
we, at least temporarily, switch to no longer use Socket.IO).
There might be a need to upgrade the client-side too though, because
the SWF talks in WebSocket
Epic? WAIB goes under there.
From: Thomas Wrobel
To: wave-dev@incubator.apache.org
Sent: Mon, 29 August, 2011 14:30:16
Subject: Re: Update Wiki for Apache Wave
Sure...should I categorise this as just a "TASK" or maybe a
"STORY".kinda new to all this so not
Thanks for investigating this. Actually I already checked about switching to
Jetty7 but it seems like they changed some classes, so it would require
significant refactoring of existing code.
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
> For the server-side code, Socket.IO-Java seems to
Would this do as the task;
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAVE-290
On 29 August 2011 15:50, Paul Thomas wrote:
> Epic? WAIB goes under there.
>
>
>
>
> From: Thomas Wrobel
> To: wave-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Mon, 29 August, 2011 14:30:16
> Subject
Yeah :) Thanks
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Thomas Wrobel wrote:
> Would this do as the task;
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAVE-290
>
>
> On 29 August 2011 15:50, Paul Thomas wrote:
> > Epic? WAIB goes under there.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Thomas
@Michael, Can you please add Thomas to contributors so he would be able to
assign the JIRA task to himself?
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Yuri Z wrote:
> Yeah :) Thanks
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Thomas Wrobel wrote:
>
>> Would this do as the task;
>> https://issues.apache.org/jir
done.
On Aug 29, 2011, at 7:16 AM, Yuri Z wrote:
> @Michael, Can you please add Thomas to contributors so he would be able to
> assign the JIRA task to himself?
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Yuri Z wrote:
> Yeah :) Thanks
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Thomas Wrobel wrote:
>
I wrote a early draft here;
https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=14AbilsPE6NRTwBildiTtSQ4I5T3Is7lbmgHnUt95lMc
Let me know if I am going along the right lines, and I'll correct/add
to based on feedback.
-Thomas
~~
Reviews of anything, by anyone;
www.rateoholic.co.uk
Please try out my new s
Great work Thomas, thanks!
Just one suggestion - can we move the discussion to Google Wave?
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 8:35 PM, Thomas Wrobel wrote:
> I wrote a early draft here;
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/pub?id=14AbilsPE6NRTwBildiTtSQ4I5T3Is7lbmgHnUt95lMc
>
> Let me know if I am going a
You mean at;
http://waveinabox.net/
I thought of that , but I cant seem to load it.
"A turbulence detected!
Please save your last changes to somewhere and reload the wave."
(starts as soon as a load - Chrome 14.0.835.109 beta-m. Doesn't work
on the Beta of chrome?)
On 29 August 2011 19:42, Yu
By "Google Wave" I think he meant wave.google.com, which, at the moment, is
a bit more stable and reliable than WIAB (no offense to Yuri's setup).
--Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 15:56, Thomas Wrobel wrote:
> You mean at;
> http://waveinabox.net/
> I thought of that , but I c
19 matches
Mail list logo
