Re: wave behind Nginx

2013-03-11 Thread Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado
El 07/03/13 11:04, Ali Lown escribió: > Hi Puma, > > The wave codebase has lots of locations where it assumes that it has > complete control of the domain it is set to. Attempting to put it in a > sub-directory fails in the way that you have seen. > The reason it assumes it is because the Jetty se

Re: Re: wave behind Nginx

2013-03-07 Thread Puma Ingénieux
Hi Ali, Thanks for the quick answer. For the moment, I'll move wave to a sub-domain. Might look at the code later on, if I got some time, but I have little experience with Java and none with Web Development...

Re: wave behind Nginx

2013-03-07 Thread Ali Lown
Hi Puma, The wave codebase has lots of locations where it assumes that it has complete control of the domain it is set to. Attempting to put it in a sub-directory fails in the way that you have seen. The reason it assumes it is because the Jetty server believes it is running without having any pro

wave behind Nginx

2013-03-06 Thread Puma Ingénieux
I got the latest version of wave from the svn and the latest nginx (in development) able to proxy websocket. I set my wave config this way http_websocket_public_address = mydomain.com:9898 http_frontend_public_address = mydomain.com:80/wave http_websocket_presented_address = mydomain.com:80/wave