Re: static code analysis

2016-01-04 Thread Evan Hughes
I think only infra have accounts, which files are you talking about exactly Angus. On 4 January 2016 at 21:35, Angus Turner wrote: > Is there a way to get an account to mark issues as closed, won't fix etc? > > Briefly having a look there's a heap of errors that are in > depedancies/minified cod

Re: static code analysis

2016-01-04 Thread Angus Turner
Is there a way to get an account to mark issues as closed, won't fix etc? Briefly having a look there's a heap of errors that are in depedancies/minified code which should be marked as 'won't fix' to make it look a little better, happy to do a bit of triage... Thanks Angus Turner e: h...@theangu

Re: static code analysis

2016-01-04 Thread Yuri Z
Yeah, 101 critical - could be a nice starter task to fix it :) On Fri, Jan 1, 2016 at 7:49 AM Evan Hughes wrote: > looks like infra were able to get the repo to work > https://analysis.apache.org/dashboard/index/251359 > > On 27 December 2015 at 17:14, Evan Hughes wrote: > > > more importantly

Re: static code analysis

2015-12-31 Thread Evan Hughes
looks like infra were able to get the repo to work https://analysis.apache.org/dashboard/index/251359 On 27 December 2015 at 17:14, Evan Hughes wrote: > more importantly how many issues do you think we will have on sonar ;) > haha. > > On 27 December 2015 at 17:02, Evan Hughes wrote: > >> hadnt

Re: static code analysis

2015-12-26 Thread Evan Hughes
more importantly how many issues do you think we will have on sonar ;) haha. On 27 December 2015 at 17:02, Evan Hughes wrote: > hadnt noticed anything my end that may be causing an issue, If you find > something I'ld gladly hunt it down. > > On 27 December 2015 at 16:54, Yuri Z wrote: > >> I th

Re: static code analysis

2015-12-26 Thread Evan Hughes
hadnt noticed anything my end that may be causing an issue, If you find something I'ld gladly hunt it down. On 27 December 2015 at 16:54, Yuri Z wrote: > I think jdk 1.8 causes issues when compiling the source. > > On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 8:52 AM Evan Hughes wrote: > > > thanks yuri, you may wa

Re: static code analysis

2015-12-26 Thread Yuri Z
I think jdk 1.8 causes issues when compiling the source. On Sun, Dec 27, 2015 at 8:52 AM Evan Hughes wrote: > thanks yuri, you may want to add to the ticket which version of jdk you > wanna run with it, I believe either jdk 7 or 8 will do. If you choose 8 > then we will have to update the gradle

Re: static code analysis

2015-12-26 Thread Evan Hughes
thanks yuri, you may want to add to the ticket which version of jdk you wanna run with it, I believe either jdk 7 or 8 will do. If you choose 8 then we will have to update the gradle file to set compatibility to 1.8 down the track but its non-blocking. On 27 December 2015 at 03:33, Yuri Z wrote:

Re: static code analysis

2015-12-26 Thread Yuri Z
I opened an issue to infra. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-11001 On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 3:09 PM Evan Hughes wrote: > Is it possible for us to get Apache Wave added to the analysis selection > over at https://analysis.apache.org/. > > I believe it would benefit us in the future deve

static code analysis

2015-12-26 Thread Evan Hughes
Is it possible for us to get Apache Wave added to the analysis selection over at https://analysis.apache.org/. I believe it would benefit us in the future developments. ~ Evan Hughes