> On March 21, 2013, 2:05 p.m., Ali Lown wrote:
> > Tested locally and seems to work as expected.
> >
> > Code is fine, allows extending to more complex colour pickers in future if
> > needed. (Though not sure if this is really necessary).
>
> Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado wrote:
> Another simple
> On March 21, 2013, 2:05 p.m., Ali Lown wrote:
> > Tested locally and seems to work as expected.
> >
> > Code is fine, allows extending to more complex colour pickers in future if
> > needed. (Though not sure if this is really necessary).
>
> Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado wrote:
> Another simple
> On March 21, 2013, 2:05 p.m., Ali Lown wrote:
> > Tested locally and seems to work as expected.
> >
> > Code is fine, allows extending to more complex colour pickers in future if
> > needed. (Though not sure if this is really necessary).
>
> Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado wrote:
> Another simple
> On March 21, 2013, 2:05 p.m., Ali Lown wrote:
> > Tested locally and seems to work as expected.
> >
> > Code is fine, allows extending to more complex colour pickers in future if
> > needed. (Though not sure if this is really necessary).
>
> Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado wrote:
> Another simple
> On March 21, 2013, 2:05 p.m., Ali Lown wrote:
> > Tested locally and seems to work as expected.
> >
> > Code is fine, allows extending to more complex colour pickers in future if
> > needed. (Though not sure if this is really necessary).
>
> Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado wrote:
> Another simple
> On March 21, 2013, 2:05 p.m., Ali Lown wrote:
> > Tested locally and seems to work as expected.
> >
> > Code is fine, allows extending to more complex colour pickers in future if
> > needed. (Though not sure if this is really necessary).
>
> Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado wrote:
> Another simple
> On March 21, 2013, 2:05 p.m., Ali Lown wrote:
> > Tested locally and seems to work as expected.
> >
> > Code is fine, allows extending to more complex colour pickers in future if
> > needed. (Though not sure if this is really necessary).
>
> Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado wrote:
> Another simple
> On March 21, 2013, 2:05 p.m., Ali Lown wrote:
> > Tested locally and seems to work as expected.
> >
> > Code is fine, allows extending to more complex colour pickers in future if
> > needed. (Though not sure if this is really necessary).
>
> Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado wrote:
> Another simple
> On March 21, 2013, 2:05 p.m., Ali Lown wrote:
> > Tested locally and seems to work as expected.
> >
> > Code is fine, allows extending to more complex colour pickers in future if
> > needed. (Though not sure if this is really necessary).
>
> Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado wrote:
> Another simple
> On March 21, 2013, 2:05 p.m., Ali Lown wrote:
> > Tested locally and seems to work as expected.
> >
> > Code is fine, allows extending to more complex colour pickers in future if
> > needed. (Though not sure if this is really necessary).
>
> Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado wrote:
> Another simple
> On March 21, 2013, 2:05 p.m., Ali Lown wrote:
> > Tested locally and seems to work as expected.
> >
> > Code is fine, allows extending to more complex colour pickers in future if
> > needed. (Though not sure if this is really necessary).
>
> Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado wrote:
> Another simple
> On March 21, 2013, 2:05 p.m., Ali Lown wrote:
> > Tested locally and seems to work as expected.
> >
> > Code is fine, allows extending to more complex colour pickers in future if
> > needed. (Though not sure if this is really necessary).
Another simple color picker that I want to develop is
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9841/#review18206
---
Ship it!
Tested locally and seems to work as expected.
Code is fine
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9841/
---
(Updated March 11, 2013, 12:13 p.m.)
Review request for wave, Michael MacFadden,
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9841/
---
Review request for wave, Michael MacFadden, Yuri Zelikov, Ali Lown, and hegsie.
15 matches
Mail list logo
