Ali,
Im halfway through next pull request for docs, the APi's were never
transferred off of waveprotocol so its taking time transferring all that.
and fair enough ill read up to see what apache wants from me.
On 23 August 2015 at 11:14, Ali Lown wrote:
> Evan,
>
> > Yeah I think better to igno
Evan,
> Yeah I think better to ignore my original request, I understand why it
> isn't in the git repository now so all sweet.
Phew. It wasn't me being oblivious to something in your original request. :)
> Should be able to have docs
> transferred from confluence + new design and new design for
Yeah I think better to ignore my original request, I understand why it
isn't in the git repository now so all sweet. Should be able to have docs
transferred from confluence + new design and new design for website done by
first week of September. If there is any features on new website that you
two
Ill get back to you about it, I think current system is fine just forgot
where it was located.
Trying to get a patch ready for wave anyway atm so wont be able to touch
website design just yet. Hopefully before the review.
On 23/08/2015 5:23 AM, "Ali Lown" wrote:
> Hi Evan,
>
> Not entirely sure
Hi Evan,
Not entirely sure what this would constitute. Are you proposing
redesigning the website from scratch to not make use of the Apache
CMS?
Currently the reference version lives in the Wave subversion space (as
required for all the CMS scripts to work properly). This is already as
close to a
Making styling for the docs already, might as well chuck the website's css
ontop.
On 11 August 2015 at 20:37, Yuri Z wrote:
> Fine with me, but I think that would require sufficient effort.
>
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Evan Hughes wrote:
>
> > Does the mailing list think it would be be
Fine with me, but I think that would require sufficient effort.
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:58 PM, Evan Hughes wrote:
> Does the mailing list think it would be beneficial for the Apache Wave
> website's design and content to be a separate repository if this is even
> possible?
>
> By making the c
