Am I fine to make this a informal vote and decide the outcome as +1. It has
been open from the allocated time and no one has -1 it. We also have
all +1's from core maintainers.
Ive made a record of it here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=69406715 and
will update r
@Thomas I do not think there is enough to justify it for when we get back
around to it since it was written for android 5 and were already up to 7.
On Mon, 17 Apr 2017 at 05:36 Pablo Ojanguren wrote:
> +1
>
>
> El El dom, 16 abr 2017 a las 16:44, Yuri Z escribió:
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 15
+1
El El dom, 16 abr 2017 a las 16:44, Yuri Z escribió:
> +1
>
> On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 2:21 PM Thomas Wrobel wrote:
>
> > If he adoption of SwellRT as the main branch for Wave goes ahead, then
> > that has some sort of Android test client anyway, so this project is
> > likely both unfinished
+1
On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 2:21 PM Thomas Wrobel wrote:
> If he adoption of SwellRT as the main branch for Wave goes ahead, then
> that has some sort of Android test client anyway, so this project is
> likely both unfinished and redundant.
> That said, there's always a chance it has interface co
If he adoption of SwellRT as the main branch for Wave goes ahead, then
that has some sort of Android test client anyway, so this project is
likely both unfinished and redundant.
That said, there's always a chance it has interface code that could be reused?
--
http://lostagain.nl <-- our company sit
