uhh, wow that is Amazing actually!
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 4:47 PM, Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro
wrote:
> That looks fantastic!
>
> —Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro
> On Jun 21, 2013 4:24 PM, "Bruno Gonzalez (aka stenyak)" >
> wrote:
>
> > I finally added *proper* support for inline replies. Keep in mind th
That looks fantastic!
—Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro
On Jun 21, 2013 4:24 PM, "Bruno Gonzalez (aka stenyak)"
wrote:
> I finally added *proper* support for inline replies. Keep in mind the bot
> is still only converting from wave to email (not the other way around).
>
> Here's the result: http://imgur.
I finally added *proper* support for inline replies. Keep in mind the bot
is still only converting from wave to email (not the other way around).
Here's the result: http://imgur.com/a/Dkefp
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 11:48 PM, Bruno Gonzalez (aka stenyak) <
sten...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So I've been
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Yuri Z wrote:
> I think that Bruno's idea was to add the emailing bridge feature built into
> WIAB. The advantage of using the "agents" framework instead of pure robots
> is that an agent is auto hosted and auto registered by the wave server. So,
> every WIAB serv
I think that Bruno's idea was to add the emailing bridge feature built into
WIAB. The advantage of using the "agents" framework instead of pure robots
is that an agent is auto hosted and auto registered by the wave server. So,
every WIAB server will have this feature out of the box. The experiments
Bruno:
The new https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wave/experiments/ directory
could probably be the best place to host/put this "project", what do you
think?
http://alfredo.abambres.com
*"Moving, always moving, and living inside movement". Rainer Maria Rilke*
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:
Some background:
The motivation of the bot is mainly to allow migrating the apache-wave
mailing list discussion into a wave-based platform (so that we can eat our
own food).
It's not necessarily my intention to "embed" the bot into WiaB, but that
has been the easiest route for me. If this could r
Wait—so this is being done with a 'bot, but the 'bot is baked into the WIAB
server? Might it be better to separate the 'bot out so it can be used with
hypothetical future wave clients?
Please correct me if I misinterpreted your message.
—Zachary “Gamer_Z.” Yaro
On Jun 19, 2013 2:21 PM, "Yuri Z"
I think you can go ahead and send a patch.
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Bruno Gonzalez (aka stenyak) <
sten...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Haven't worked on the bot much these days, but I've cleaned up the commits
> so that I can publish what I already have. Keep in mind this is an alpha
> version,
Haven't worked on the bot much these days, but I've cleaned up the commits
so that I can publish what I already have. Keep in mind this is an alpha
version, it lacks many features, has many bugs, etc.
https://github.com/stenyak/wave/commits/maillist
The email bot configuration is done directly in
I do have time also to be a ''regular user'' . Feel free to contact me as
neeeded. Bravo! Bruno
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 9:56 PM, Alfredo Abambres wrote:
> Thank you Bruno for trying to make this. I can't be much of assistance on
> this point, but if you need a "regular user" to help you test it
Thank you Bruno for trying to make this. I can't be much of assistance on
this point, but if you need a "regular user" to help you test it, just wave
:-)
http://alfredo.abambres.com
*"Moving, always moving, and living inside movement". Rainer Maria Rilke*
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Bruno G
Right now, in part due to its alpha state, and in part due to bugs (I can't
receive newBlip notifications, etc), emails are only sent when the user
writes "bot:send\n". At that very moment, the bot sends a single email.
Regarding synchronization schedule, we could keep a list of "blips not yet
syn
sounds like a very interesting bridge to keep the community both efficient
and in formed. Thanks!
John
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Bruno Gonzalez (aka stenyak) <
sten...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So I've been working on this for the past days. Still a work-in-progress,
> and will need at least an
Bruno,
This looks quite cool.
The main thing I am thinking is how 'big' an event has to be before
triggering sending an email. (A spelling correction is hardly worth
it)
We also don't want a large sequence of emails being sent for changes
happening within a few seconds of each other (think simult
15 matches
Mail list logo
