On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 1:48 AM, John Blossom wrote:
> Christian,
>
> Having borrowed most of this copy from the Cloud Stack
> guidelines,apparently they have a list specifically devoted to marketing.
> Seems like this might be a good move for Apache Wave so that developers can
> focus more on what
Christian,
Having borrowed most of this copy from the Cloud Stack
guidelines,apparently they have a list specifically devoted to marketing.
Seems like this might be a good move for Apache Wave so that developers can
focus more on what they want to without being annoyed. I've lived in both
worlds f
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 10:04 PM, John Blossom wrote:
> Social Media guidelines are up, I made a few minor tweaks to bring the
> Cloud Stack template up to date.
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Apache+Wave+Social+Media+Guidelines
This is very good!
I would add that PMC membe
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:49 PM, John Blossom wrote:
> Yuri,
>
> I am fine with WaveWatchers being who we are, but WaveWatchers carries its
> own branding - if we're going to do things specific to Apache Wave as a
> community, then we should use that brand specifically, is my thinking. Most
> espe
Social Media guidelines are up, I made a few minor tweaks to bring the
Cloud Stack template up to date.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Apache+Wave+Social+Media+Guidelines
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 3:51 PM, John Blossom wrote:
> Ali,
>
> Great suggestion on guidelines, will post
Ali,
Great suggestion on guidelines, will post similar for us for review.
John
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 2:32 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> This seems like a good idea to me.
> As long as we keep multiple comitters as admins, I don't think there should
> be a problem.
>
> Could you first put together a
Yuri,
I am fine with WaveWatchers being who we are, but WaveWatchers carries its
own branding - if we're going to do things specific to Apache Wave as a
community, then we should use that brand specifically, is my thinking. Most
especially, when we do something good as a community, in Google+ I'd
Why not just use WaveWatcher's page?
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> This seems like a good idea to me.
> As long as we keep multiple comitters as admins, I don't think there should
> be a problem.
>
> Could you first put together a page of guidelines on the wiki? (Like
> Clo
This seems like a good idea to me.
As long as we keep multiple comitters as admins, I don't think there should
be a problem.
Could you first put together a page of guidelines on the wiki? (Like
CloudStack has:
https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/social-media-guidelines.html)
Ali
On 31 Jul 2013 19
