This small "thing" is definitely a great step forward on getting even more
engaged builders/devs and to accelerate new/better ideas/experiments. It's
also a step into making the Apache Wave community a more clear "home" for
all the Wave devs out there, not just the WIAB ones.
I'm so anxious to see
Experiments directory added in
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wave/experiments/ .
-J
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Joseph Gentle wrote:
> Following from Michael MacFadden's suggestion to put related
> (hopefully integrated) technologies into the same wave repository, I
> propose
Well, I hope I'm still a committer - I wrote a fair bit of WIAB when
we were moving away from google. Its ancient history now, but I wrote
most of the database code in WIAB, the authentication code, the login
& logout pages and status toolbar. I also wrote some tests for the
search indexing iirc &
In which case, Joseph should send in an ICLA, and we can get the account
sorted. Thx for spotting Yuri.
Upayavira
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013, at 11:39 PM, Yuri Z wrote:
> By the way Joseph, your name is on the list of committers for the Apache
> Wave http://incubator.apache.org/wave/people.html , You m
Sounds like a good idea to have multiple experiments moving forward. Lots
of great ideas floating around now that are worth trying out. Fast-fail is
the order of the day for the moment, which should allow us to decide things
such as what goes on which side of the API, etc. John
On Fri, Jun 14, 201
By the way Joseph, your name is on the list of committers for the Apache
Wave http://incubator.apache.org/wave/people.html , You might want to make
request to the infra to claim a username so you will be able to handle the
experimental related issues by yourself.
On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 11:00 PM,
At this point, **all** code should be exempt from code review.
To explain in more detail, there's two models a project can follow:
= review then commit =
Mature communities usually follow this, when there's substantial risk in
making chances. Wave is way to young for this, IMO.
= commit then re
+1 from me.
This seems perfectly reasonable. (Assumedly each experiment gets its own
directory in there.)
Having code reviews during 'expermentation' would defeat its purpose...
The only thing to note, is that it won't appear in the wave github mirror
(though this may be a feature...)
Ali
On 14