Re: Design review: A plan

2015-09-09 Thread Thomas Wrobel
Regarding p2p based approaches not being mature enough for OT, are we talking about https://ipfs.io/ like solutions here? I know little about the underlying durability or availability of such technologies, merely it seems best not to reinvent any wheels if others have already done the work. ~~~

Re: Design review: A plan

2015-09-09 Thread Yuri Z
Hi Joseph It's great you are moving forward. My concern is that you go for too much without clear monetization plan. Honestly, i don't think I can fully grasp your plan, but it seems to me that you should go just for p2p content servers without specifically designing identity servers and embedding

Re: Design review: A plan

2015-09-09 Thread Thomas Wrobel
+1 JSON I like Json. It all sounds pretty good, with a new codebase maybe I'd stand more chance of meaningfully helping at some point next year. ~~~ Thomas & Bertines online review show: http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) On 9 September

Re: Design review: A plan

2015-09-09 Thread John Blossom
Joseph, I am very excited and encouraged by your overall approach. JSON's the way to go, clearly. Given the power and purity of what you are trying to accomplish in a core form, I agree that p2p may be too much of a stretch at this point. The ability to separate content servers and identity server

Design review: A plan

2015-09-09 Thread Joseph Gentle
Hi everyone! I want to get some feedback on a rough plan I have going forward. Next year I'm moving to Europe (not sure where yet - gonna spend a month or two travelling first before settling. Berlin?) I want to start my own business, and I'm considering making that business a simple(r) successor