El 19/06/13 16:00, Christian Grobmeier escribió:
> Hi all,
>
> from time to time I see in several projects the term "lead developer"
> coming up. Sometimes incubating projects are confused also when to
> grant committership.
>
> On the "lead developer": the ASF is a do-cracy, as we sometimes say.
I somewhat agree with Yuri on this. I think for the experiments section
we should not require code reviews. I think the code reviews have been
very helpful for people to collaborate and learn the existing codebase and
has kept it from introducing a lot of instabilities. I would note that
almost
Hi Upayavira
While reviews are not strictly required by Apache, each community has it's
own culture. The decision to pre review or post review is a trade off. With
pros and cons on each side.
In my opinion we should to continue to pre review each commit for the
following reasons:
- Each develop
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013, at 03:00 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> from time to time I see in several projects the term "lead developer"
> coming up. Sometimes incubating projects are confused also when to
> grant committership.
>
> On the "lead developer": the ASF is a do-cracy, as we
Hi all,
from time to time I see in several projects the term "lead developer"
coming up. Sometimes incubating projects are confused also when to
grant committership.
On the "lead developer": the ASF is a do-cracy, as we sometimes say.
The guy who "does things" is actually leading it. We do not ha
