+1 for Gerrit
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:35 AM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Yuri Z wrote:
>
> > Hi
> > Until now we used ReviewBoard for code reviews. It's a powerful app and
> it
> > served us well, but it seems like there are a few pros and cons.
> > As we recently
for wave development!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ~~~
> Thomas & Bertines online review show:
> http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html
> Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :)
>
>
> On 15 December 2013
Would something like jrebel be helpful?
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Thomas Wrobel wrote:
> hmz. Ok, I'll have to work this out, as that would annoy me too much.
> Waiting 5 minutes for each change.
> I know its possible outside eclipse, as its just some google thing being
> run by eclipse.
+1 for git.
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> As one of the main contention points, lets get Wave moved off the
> git-svn life support, and in to a true git repository.
> Since this would affect everyone (especially the other developers), I
> am just going to run a quick check
I vote stay, for what it's worth.
I would have an easier time funding one or more developers if I know the
resulting code would eventually reside under the Apache umbrella. Best of
luck either way though.
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 9:48 AM, Upayavira wrote:
> It seems to me that the time has com
It sounds as though the project has momentum on two or more compatible
fronts. I'm most interested in the mavenization effort and would be happy
to help test.
-R
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Michael MacFadden <
michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would still be more than happy to press
It sounds as though the project has momentum on two (or more?) compatible
fronts. I'm personally very interested in the mavenization effort and would
be happy to help test.
-R
On Sun, Dec 1, 2013 at 7:46 PM, Michael MacFadden <
michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would still be more than
the same, so you could say that it is similar.
>
> Ali
>
> On 18 June 2013 16:13, Ryan Hill wrote:
> > Hi Ali,
> > Without advocating for anything, do you think WaveBus is at all similar
> to
> > OSGi Event Admin? Just being curious...
> >
> > Thanks,
&g
Hi Ali,
Without advocating for anything, do you think WaveBus is at all similar to
OSGi Event Admin? Just being curious...
Thanks,
--Ryan
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 7:57 AM, Ali Lown wrote:
> Yes.
>
> Originally, the WaveBus was how GWave components was split between
> different machines, so had
Same. It seems like an invite-only affair from what I can see.
On Jun 5, 2013 10:27 AM, "Christian Grobmeier" wrote:
> hello folks,
>
> i am around, but i cannot join somehow.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Alfredo Abambres
> wrote:
> > Christian: Thank you.
> >
> > John (he wi
10 matches
Mail list logo
