Hi there,
I'm maybe a bit out of date on current C/S implementation, so sorry if II
state something wrong here but for what I remember for wave-vs
implementation on this...
Theory for Client Side is to cache you local updates sending one by one to
server while accept WaveletUpdates coming from Se
I only can say ...
+1
jesus
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Chris Harvey wrote:
> Seems to me we are (already) seeing "WIAB" verses "Wave" confusion
> starting.
>
> This is what I feared when we were discussing whether the specs should be
> part of Apache. As Torben pointed out, "Apache Wave"
inue with dicussion we must take in consideration Andrus
advice and change thread name :) (sorry Andrus)
Jesus Salas
wave-vs.net CTO
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 1:28 AM, Tad Glines wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Jesus Salas
> wrote:
>
> > 1) C#.Net XMPP Client
>
whole.
>
> Apache Wave is one implementation among others.We should resist the idea of
> including all wave related software into the Apache Wave project. At some
> point the project must graduate and it must hit a release mile stone. The
> more we throw in, the harder it gets.
>
tters will chime in on this.
> However, I suspect that until we know the scope of what you wish to open
> source, we really can't make any decision as to whether or not to include
> it
> in the WiaB project.
>
> -Tad
>
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Jesus Salas
>
hen we can start
> looking for new housemates :)
>
> James
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 9:22 AM, Jesus Salas
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Torben,
> >
> > It seems for what you say you want to keep Wave isolated from other
> > possible
> > technologies and implem
ainst somebody, I'm not native english speaker and
I know my English limitations can show other attiture for what I say that is
not really intentionally so my apologies if someone feel this email goes in
the wrong way because evreything is really 'in my humble opinion'...
R
sitory and code reviews as we switch to
> Apache's tools and processes in the near future.
>
> Soren
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Andrus Adamchik
> wrote:
> > To become a committer you need to start contributing to the project. E.g.
> read these messages
I mean ... for a commiter account...
jesus
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Jesus Salas wrote:
> Sorry me,
>
> How to submit or a Committer account?
>
> thank you
>
> On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Andrus Adamchik <
> and...@objectstyle.org> wrote:
>
&
Sorry me,
How to submit or a Committer account?
thank you
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote:
> Yes, I will handle it.
>
> It was my intent to attempt to gather information on as many committer
> accounts as we can before sending infra request, but yes I fully expected
> th
might help, and also I'll adapt some pieces of wave-vs code
to be open source and share with the project...
regards
jesus salas
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Nathanael Abbotts
wrote:
> As the project plans to move to a new home at Apache, I feel quite strongly
> that it would b
11 matches
Mail list logo
