Re: Python client API

+1 Incompatible code just confuses things even more. ~~~ Thomas & Bertines online review show: http://randomreviewshow.com/index.html Try it! You might even feel ambivalent about it :) On 7 April 2015 at 22:54, Angus Turner wrote: > I'm inclined to +1 this. > > Part of the reason wave is so har

Re: Review Request 25034: FormButtonClicked event for Robot API ; From Element addition from robots

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/25034/#review79258 --- Sorry it took so long, I am going to review this now. - Yuri Zeliko

Re: Python client API

I'm inclined to +1 this. Part of the reason wave is so hard to adopt is there's just so much code, some of it just remnant of the code dump Google did. Removing this is a step towards cleaning up! Thanks Angus Turner e: h...@theangus.org On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 6:32 AM, Yuri Z wrote: > Hi > T

Python client API

Hi The WIAB project has sources of the Google Wave python client API. So far no one cared to update them to work with WIAB. Do we want to keep the python sources in project? Or maybe it is better just to delete them? I would prefer to delete as there's no point to keep sources that don't work and n

Re: Review Request 32893: Replaces custom config framework with typesafe config

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32893/#review79247 --- Ship it! LGTM. - Ali Lown On April 6, 2015, 7:23 p.m., Yuri Zeli

Re: WAVE-70

Hi Ben, > Sending multiple versions of the email using the MIME implementation would > be perfect, I have just a couple of questions... > 1. I would assume we should send "text/plain" and "text/html", should we > also send something like "application/wave"? What would "application/wave" > look lik

Re: Review Request 32893: Replaces custom config framework with typesafe config

> On April 7, 2015, 12:22 p.m., Ali Lown wrote: > > server-config.xml, line 23 > > > > > > Why does this need to remain? > > > > Actually, why does this file exist at all anymore? We could move the > > prosody

Re: WAVE-70

Hi Ali, Sending multiple versions of the email using the MIME implementation would be perfect, I have just a couple of questions... 1. I would assume we should send "text/plain" and "text/html", should we also send something like "application/wave"? What would "application/wave" look like? is ther

Re: RC7 Vote Release

Hi, I've downloaded and ran up an instance to test it's operational @ wiab.cloudapp.net feel free to test with it. :) +1 On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Ali Lown wrote: > Hi all, > > The end time for this is tomorrow, more votes = better! > > So, if you downloaded and tested this, but forgot to

Re: RC7 Vote Release

Hi all, The end time for this is tomorrow, more votes = better! So, if you downloaded and tested this, but forgot to send an email, then this is your last chance. If you haven't downloaded and tested this yet, then please do so soon! Thanks, Ali On 5 April 2015 at 22:02, Michael MacFadden wrot

Re: Review Request 32893: Replaces custom config framework with typesafe config

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/32893/#review79166 --- Looks generally fine to me. You seem to have made other small change

Re: Coming Months

Thanks for this, Evan. Given it was you that proposed the Hangout, it would seem reasonable that we try to accommodate you. Anyone here have any objections to an earlier concall, say, 2pm UTC? Are there any Pacific time participants? Regarding the document, we need to keep it *really* simple. To