Ok
On Jul 17, 2014, at 7:42 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> I ran it a while back, but things have changed, so I would suggest
> rerunning.
>
> Ali
> On 17 Jul 2014 17:40, "Yuri Zelikov" wrote:
>
>> Do you think we should run it or we already got it covered?
>> On Jul 17, 2014, at 7:38 PM, Ali Lown wro
I ran it a while back, but things have changed, so I would suggest
rerunning.
Ali
On 17 Jul 2014 17:40, "Yuri Zelikov" wrote:
> Do you think we should run it or we already got it covered?
> On Jul 17, 2014, at 7:38 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
>
> > RAT, but it can be a bit overly sensitive.
> >
> > Ali
Do you think we should run it or we already got it covered?
On Jul 17, 2014, at 7:38 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
> RAT, but it can be a bit overly sensitive.
>
> Ali
> On 17 Jul 2014 17:37, "Yuri Z" wrote:
>
>> Is there some tool to verify that all files have the licences?
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2
RAT, but it can be a bit overly sensitive.
Ali
On 17 Jul 2014 17:37, "Yuri Z" wrote:
> Is there some tool to verify that all files have the licences?
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Michael MacFadden <
> michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> > Although I have been dormant.
Is there some tool to verify that all files have the licences?
On Sat, Jul 12, 2014 at 5:18 PM, Michael MacFadden <
michael.macfad...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All,
>
> Although I have been dormant. I am willing to help out with the release
> in any way possible. If you need some one to go through t
Looks like you're making bood progress with ShareJS, Joseph, still some
hurdles but the community is making progress. As you point out in the
ShareJS literature, more work is needed to get binaries to intersperse
messages with text/rich text.
All the best,
John Blossom
email: jblos...@gmail.com
