Re: Review Request 16322: full text search (with known issue of solr-bot output highlight)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16322/#review30803 --- Thanks Frank. We are getting a lot closer now, here are my semantic

Re: Current Release Status

Ok that makes sense. I will start working on the downloads section. I would like to get back in to coding after the release is done. Also potentially reviving the maven build. But for now, I think working on the web site will help let you all focus on code and release. So that is what I will d

Re: Current Release Status

> Great news on GIT. I think that will hep us immensely. I have been > following a lot of the mailing list. Actually I spent quite while reading > the list over the last few days. Yes. Subversion has been a point of 'stickiness' with new devs in the past, and the workflow was quite convoluted.

Re: Current Release Status

Ali (and everyone else), Great news on GIT. I think that will hep us immensely. I have been following a lot of the mailing list. Actually I spent quite while reading the list over the last few days. The full text search feature looks very promising. I have been following the code reviews. I

Re: Current Release Status

Michael (et al.), Following on from RC4 there were only a few minor things left that needed fixing: 1) Licenses of a few random files 2) Some icons in thumbnail_patterns/ which had some unknown licensing (1) has been fixed for a while in the wave-0.4-release branch. (2) was fixed within the last

Current Release Status

All, It¹s been a while since I have been able to contribute to the project. I would like to re-engage. To that end, I was wondering where we are with the process of making a release. Could some one summarize where we are at? Thanks ~Michael

Re: Review Request 16322: full text search (with known issue of solr-bot output highlight)

--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/16322/ --- (Updated Dec. 23, 2013, 1:10 a.m.) Review request for wave, Ali Lown, Vicente J

Re: Review Request 16322: full text search (with known issue of solr-bot output highlight)

I put a log of playing with git commands here, merge with latest code - Google Drive<https://docs.google.com/document/d/1EGPlvYX-aS9PRI77-weSd7SDm_SizcDJbo5kgGu0gds/edit#> I found that these should be all I needed. git pull origin master git diff master --binary > full-text-search-2013

Re: Setting up Wave for client development (my experience setting up on WindowsXP)

I put the screenshot here as well, gwt debug mode for wave in a box - Google Drive On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Ali Lown wrote: > Attachments are dropped by the list. > On 22 Dec 2013 14:29, "Frank R."

Re: Setting up Wave for client development (my experience setting up on WindowsXP)

Attachments are dropped by the list. On 22 Dec 2013 14:29, "Frank R." wrote: > Here is a screenshot of my debug configuration. > > > On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 10:27 PM, Frank R. wrote: > >> I attached to 8001, and stepped through >> org.waveprotocol.box.webclient.client.WebClient.onModuleLoad(). I

Re: Setting up Wave for client development (my experience setting up on WindowsXP)

Can you show how you did that? Thanks~ On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Joseph Gentle wrote: > I've certainly used eclipse's debugger to step through code in the > client, but I'm not sure if I ever had a fast (or instant) change-run > loop working. Most of the work I did was tests (or well tes

Re: Setting up Wave for client development (my experience setting up on WindowsXP)

I attached to 8001, and stepped through org.waveprotocol.box.webclient.client.WebClient.onModuleLoad(). I just verified you can have Java class hot deployment by edit-and-save. Here is how you can do the same, EclipseZone - Remote Debugging with Eclipse ...

Re: Review Request 16322: full text search (with known issue of solr-bot output highlight)

I will assume you have the following branch setup: "master" follows "origin/master" which is the apache repository "work" is based on "master" and has all the commits with your changes in for this When new things are pushed to the apache repo, you will want to 'git fetch; git checkout master; git