Many projects websites (and unix man pages) have sections with "See
also"/Related/Alternatives references. So even if wiab.pro is not a
vanilla wiab server (and even if rizzoma is not based on wiab code, or
sharejs, or kune, or whatever) we can still list them somewhere. We
simply have to make it c
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013, at 11:56 AM, Thomas Wrobel wrote:
> >> 2. Only servers that are satisfy the following conditions will be
> >> considered legitimate:
> >> a) WIAB based
> >> b) Free to use
> >> c) Actively contribute back to Apache Wave.
> >>
> >> I think such a solution will allow to grow t
>> 2. Only servers that are satisfy the following conditions will be
>> considered legitimate:
>> a) WIAB based
>> b) Free to use
>> c) Actively contribute back to Apache Wave.
>>
>> I think such a solution will allow to grow the Apache Wave community and
>> provide information about third party WI
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013, at 08:57 AM, Yuri Z wrote:
> I think Kirill raises here an important question - i.e. what should be
> the
> relations between the Apache Wave project and other WIAB based products.
> The issue is a bit tricky, because as I see it - Apache Wave cannot
> endorse
> or promote o
I think Kirill raises here an important question - i.e. what should be the
relations between the Apache Wave project and other WIAB based products.
The issue is a bit tricky, because as I see it - Apache Wave cannot endorse
or promote other commercial projects on one hand, but on the other hand it
