See comments inline.
On 6/24/13 1:06 PM, "Joseph Gentle" wrote:
>I want to start the discussion around what OT algorithms to use. This
>is going to get technical. This is not a bug. Please ask simple but
>tangential questions (like how does wave's current crypto system
>work?) in a new thread in
Yep, probably right. - sounds good.
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 5:53 PM, Michael MacFadden
wrote:
> I will respond to this section by section in a bit.
>
> However my general comment is that there is a lot to digest here and I think
> we need to start putting this stuff in a wiki page(s). I think it
I will respond to this section by section in a bit.
However my general comment is that there is a lot to digest here and I think we
need to start putting this stuff in a wiki page(s). I think it will get buried
here. I think we might need individual pages on each protocol idea. And the a
pro/c
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:30 PM, Ali Lown wrote:
>> 1. CRDTs (like Logoot[1])
>> 2. 'Classical' OT using vector clocks for versioning.
>> 3. The OT system [...] similar to classical OT, except using git style
>> version hashes.
>
> A quick look at Logoot's paper says that deletion is not generally
> 1. CRDTs (like Logoot[1])
> 2. 'Classical' OT using vector clocks for versioning.
> 3. The OT system [...] similar to classical OT, except using git style
> version hashes.
A quick look at Logoot's paper says that deletion is not generally
possible with CRDTs (p5 section 4) without either a) Tom
> On June 24, 2013, 5:14 p.m., Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado wrote:
> > If there isn't any comment, I'll commit this in short. Thanks.
It looks ok, but I can't read either language so have to just assume the
translations are correct...
- Ali
I want to start the discussion around what OT algorithms to use. This
is going to get technical. This is not a bug. Please ask simple but
tangential questions (like how does wave's current crypto system
work?) in a new thread instead of this one.
Requirements:
- Arbitrary peers can syncronize data
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/11948/#review22330
---
If there isn't any comment, I'll commit this in short. Thanks.
- Vi
It's perhaps superficial, but if you call these "working groups" then
perhaps that takes away some of the hoop-jumping perception. These are
sub-communities which try to attract people who can help to solve specific
problems. I like the scheme.
On Joseph's point 1a, I think that it would be accept
