I'm inclined to agree, but it would be wise for someone to subscribe to
legal-discuss@a.o and ask there. Angus, would you be willing to do that?
The question really is whether we have the right to do that, and it
depends upon the documentation that Google have provided - i.e. did they
sign a softw
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7211/
---
Review request for wave, Michael MacFadden, Vicente J. Ruiz Jurado, and Ali
Lown.
> On Sept. 21, 2012, 3:54 p.m., Yuri Zelikov wrote:
> > @Ali, is this patch ready? If so, can you commit it?
>
> Ali Lown wrote:
> As Angus says at the end: "Just waiting for someone to weigh in re:
> Google Headers"
> TLDR: Should we still be keeping the "(C) Google" headers when we ha
> On Sept. 1, 2012, 8:11 p.m., Yuri Zelikov wrote:
> > Can we maybe do this kind of logic on the server side? It seems like the
> > responsibility of the server to buffer requests in case of latency. Then it
> > will also work for other - API based clients like micro-box.
>
> Vicente J. Ruiz J
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5114/#review11779
---
There's problem with how this change is rendered by FF - it looks ugl
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7142/#review11778
---
Hi. For some reason I can't apply the patch. Can you please try to ge
> On Sept. 21, 2012, 3:54 p.m., Yuri Zelikov wrote:
> > @Ali, is this patch ready? If so, can you commit it?
As Angus says at the end: "Just waiting for someone to weigh in re: Google
Headers"
TLDR: Should we still be keeping the "(C) Google" headers when we have the
Apache headers as well?
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7077/#review11776
---
@Ali, is this patch ready? If so, can you commit it?
- Yuri Zelikov
See org.waveprotocol.box.server.robots.passive.EventGenerator.
BlipSubmitted (Will not be supported, submit ops will be phased out)
2012/9/21 田传武 :
> The BlipSubmittedEvent has not implemented yet.
>
> 2012/9/21 Thomas Telleis :
>> Hi,
>> after some hours trying I finally ask you: I'm going to w
The BlipSubmittedEvent has not implemented yet.
2012/9/21 Thomas Telleis :
> Hi,
> after some hours trying I finally ask you: I'm going to write an
> agent/robot which wants to check if the blib content is a possible N3
> triple. Therefore I thought the onBlibSubmitted event might be useful, to
>
10 matches
Mail list logo