,
--
Mahmood Gholipour
M.Sc Candidate,
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering,
College of Engineering,
University of Tehran
ma.gholip...@ut.ac.ir
ma.gholip...@ece.ut.ac.ir
mahmood.gholip...@gmail.com
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https
egress interface B?
Best Regards,
--
Mahmood Gholipour
M.Sc Candidate,
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering,
College of Engineering,
University of Tehran
___
vpp-dev mailing list
vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
https://lists.fd.io/mailman/listinfo/vpp-dev
it as inbound ACL for
interface A. I expected a ssh session to be established successfully. In
this scenario interface A is ingress interface and interface B is egress
interface. But packets are dropped by inbound ACL on interface B.
Best Regards,
--
Mahmood Gholipour
M.Sc Candidate,
Scho
and tested.
>
> --a
>
> On 8 May 2017, at 13:59, mahmood gholipour
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I tested statefull ACL by writing an ACL rule with action of
> permit+reflect and it didn't work. Is this feature completed in 17.04 and
> is expected to work properly?
>
this feature already or in vpp future plan?
Best Regards,
--
Mahmood Gholipour
M.Sc Candidate,
School of Electrical and Computer Engineering,
College of Engineering,
University of Tehran
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 9:05 PM, Andrew 👽 Yourtchenko
wrote:
>
>
> --a
>
> On 8 May 201