Hi all,
This is Soheil. We are working on a project involving the IPv4 In-Band OAM.
I have tried to use VPP in a simple scenario (like the simple
switching/routing tutorial in fd.io) to pass IPv4-Options (in out case
TIMESTAMP option) between two containers. However, packets having IP-Option
fiel
s.berkeley.
> edu/Pubs/TechRpts/2005/EECS-2005-24.pdf
>
>
>
> *From:* vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] *On
> Behalf Of *Burt Silverman
> *Sent:* Thursday, June 29, 2017 12:49 PM
> *To:* Ole Troan
> *Cc:* Soheil Abbasloo ; vpp-dev
> *
Ole,
We are in the design phase and investigating different platforms to see
which one might be used in our scenario. Here, I don't wannna discuss the
characteristics of a software router solution we all already know that! But
simply one of the key properties of a software solution like VPP should
you plan to deal with this behavior in the network ?
>
> --a
>
> On 29 Jun 2017, at 20:00, Soheil Abbasloo wrote:
>
> Dave,
>
> That paper only shows that "in their experiments they saw that half of the
> routers in INTERNET drop the packets with IPv4-Option",
-2/31sga/configuration/guide/config/mcastmls.html#wp1082100
>>
>> How do you plan to deal with this behavior in the network ?
>>
>> --a
>>
>> On 29 Jun 2017, at 20:00, Soheil Abbasloo wrote:
>>
>> Dave,
>>
>> That paper only shows tha
Ole,
> Now, all this said... I understand the temptation of the solution and
while I think it is likely a bad idea, and likely undeployable, nothing
would stop you from trying it out in VPP if you like. There is some code
that assumes the TCP header follows a 20 byte IP header, but that could
easi
il&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=oa-3177-a>
> <#m_3541350063443403557_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>
>
> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 2:08 PM, Soheil Abbasloo
> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Burt, good hint. However, the problem they try to solve doesn't
>>
