[vpp-dev] VPP Iperf3 test

2022-03-22 Thread Shankar Raju
sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec [ 34] 1.00-2.00 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec [ 34] 2.00-3.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec [ 34] 3.01-4.01 sec 0.00 Bytes 0.00 bits/sec Please let me know if I’m configuring something wrong. Thanks Shankar Raju -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links:

[vpp-dev] VPP Iperf3 Test #vpp-dev

2022-03-22 Thread Shankar Raju
Bytes  0.00 bits/sec [ 34]   2.00-3.01   sec  0.00 Bytes  0.00 bits/sec [ 34]   3.01-4.01   sec  0.00 Bytes  0.00 bits/sec Please let me know if I’m configuring something wrong. Thanks Shankar Raju -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Iperf3 test

2022-03-23 Thread Shankar Raju
Hi Florin, I'm running this experiment on AWS and its using ENA NICs. I ran vppctl show error command and I did see errors because of bad checksums. Is there a way to turn off tx and rx checksuming through vpp just like we do with ethtool ? SERVER SIDE: vppctl show errors Count                 

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Iperf3 test

2022-03-23 Thread Shankar Raju
Hi Florin, Disabling checksums worked. Now iperf is able to send and receive traffic. But the transfer rate and bitrate seems to be smaller when using VPP. Could you please let me know the right tuning params for getting better performance with VPP ? Thanks -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Iperf3 test

2022-03-23 Thread Shankar Raju
Hi Florin, I'm using VPP Version: 20.09-release. These were the results I got with the default config. Let me try some of those optimizations and see if that works. Thanks WITH VPP : Starting Test: protocol: TCP, 1 streams, 131072 byte blocks, omitting 0 seconds, 10 second test, tos 0 [ ID] Int