Hey Ray,
>From usability perspective, you are right, JVPP is not useful outside of VPP.
But on the other hand, VPP plugins are also not useful outside of VPP but they
still get dedicated projects. Same applies for Honeycomb (the VPP specific
distribution of HC at least), it is not useful witho
Hey,
VPP supports interface bonding and can be configured using DPDK configuration
(https://wiki.fd.io/view/VPP/Command-line_Arguments#.22dpdk.22_parameters).
Is there any support for interface bonding over binary APIs ?
Thanks,
Maros
___
vpp-dev mail
configuration from VPP and FDS can continue further configuration based
on its needs via Honeycomb.
Maros
From: Frank Brockners (fbrockne)
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2016 2:47 PM
To: Maros Marsalek -X (mmarsale - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco)
; vpp-dev
Subject: RE: Interface bonding (binary
Hey Balaji,
Regarding "run VPP as multiple instances" I'm not sure what you mean. Running a
single VPP but having multiple VRFs ? Or having multiple VPP processes in a
single VM, container ? Adding vpp-dev list for further info.
Regarding honeycomb/vbd codebase. That's here:
https://git.openda
