Hi Chinmaya,
By default the SR policy uses encapsulation. If you want to change this
behavior add the keyword “insert” to the sr policy command.
Thanks,
Pablo.
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Chinmaya Aggarwal
Sent: lunes, 30 de marzo de 2020 8:37
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: [vpp-d
Whats the behavior for Spray policies? Because when i used the keyword "spray",
it shows encapsulation behavior. Is there any way i can use *inline mode with
spray policies* ?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#15931): https://lists.fd
Hi Vijay,
> On 29 Mar 2020, at 08:42, Chandra Mohan, Vijay Mohan via Lists.Fd.Io
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Looking to understand the behavior of NAT in deterministic mode. The issue
> is, while in2out translations work fine and sessions are being created
> successfully, frames are getting dro
We are able to resolve this by the following command :-
*vpp# sr policy add bsid C1::999:2 next 2001:5b0:abcd::111 next
2001:5b0:23::111 insert spray*
*vpp# sr policy mod bsid C1::999:2 add sl next 2001:5b0:22::111 next
2001:5b0:23::111 insert spray*
*vpp# sr steer l3 2001:5b0:8::/64 via bsid
Hi, Neale Ranns !
Thank you for your nice reply.
I just want to ask that did anybody modify VPP to implement " *EAP
Authentication Method* "?
My current job is related to 4G/5G. I found that the IKE authentication methods
mentioned in the relevant documents are all EAP(EAP-AKA).
Does anyone hav
Hi,
To my knowledge there is neither an EAP implementation for VPP nor has support
for it has not been discussed in the public forum.
/neale
From: on behalf of Gencli Liu <18600640...@163.com>
Date: Monday 30 March 2020 at 13:47
To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Subject: Re: 答复: [E] [vpp-dev] Build
Hi,
> im usuing vpp v19.08.1 on centos 7 Kernel: Linux 4.4.211-
> 1.el7.elrepo.x86_64
> How can i build debug RPMS for vpp? if not is there any workaround for
> that?
You can try to install vpp-debuginfo package to get debug symbols for your
current installed RPMs.
Otherwise to build *debug* RPM
Coverity run failed today.
Current number of outstanding issues are 5
Newly detected: 0
Eliminated: 0
More details can be found at
https://scan.coverity.com/projects/fd-io-vpp/view_defects
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#15937): ht
Hi Nitin,
The plan of record for the next VPP LTS release is 20.09.
Note: There was a change to a 4 month release cycle for VPP last fall.
The release cycle for 2020 and beyond is 20.01, 20.05, 20.09LTS, 21.01 ...
Thanks,
-daw-
On 3/30/2020 2:00 AM, Nitin Saxena wrote:
Hi Dave,
I know f
Hi Dave,
I am still waiting for your reply.
Appreciate if you can comment.
Thanks,
Nagaraju
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 2:42 PM Nagaraju Vemuri via Lists.Fd.Io
wrote:
> Thanks for pointing out elog feature.
>
> May I understand why my suggestion is not good enough? (for my
> understanding only).
Hi Dave,
Thanks for sharing the information.
-Nitin
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Dave Wallace
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 8:49 PM
To: Nitin Saxena
Cc: vpp-dev
Subject: [EXT] Re: [vpp-dev] Next LTS release?
External Email
Hi Nitin,
The plan of reco
Hi,
Can someone please share the VPP performance measurement data in different
packet sizes for plain vanilla IPv4, IPv6, and tunnel encap/decap for IPSec,
VxLAN cases. Also do we have VPP packet forwarding data with at least one
Service VNF in the same host or in a remote host, where traffic
Hello,
You should have a look at https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2001/report/
Jerome
De : au nom de "Majumdar, Kausik"
Date : lundi 30 mars 2020 à 19:47
À : "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Objet : [vpp-dev] VPP Performance data
Hi,
Can someone please share the VPP performance measurement data in different
If you care about master/latest, also check out
https://docs.fd.io/csit/master/trending/
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Jerome Tollet via
Lists.Fd.Io
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 2:40 PM
To: Majumdar, Kausik ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Perfor
Hi,
I want to check if perfmon is needed in vpp.
Who uses it? or How to use perfmon plugin exactly?
Is it safe to remove perfmon plugin from vpp, if we decide to not use it?
Thanks,
Nagaraju
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#15944):
It’s an on-demand performance monitor controlled by a set of debug CLI
commands. It doesn’t anything unless enabled, and it certainly won’t hurt
anything to disable it.
Disable the plugin in /etc/vpp/startup.conf if you like.
Dave
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Nagaraju Vemuri
Sent: M
Thanks Dave, Jerome. Will go through it.
I was specifically looking on VPP 20.01 as I was able to get FRR 3.0.3 working
for IPv4 BGP, OSPF with VPP 20.01. Need to try out FRR BGP neighbors and routes
scale with VPP DP, so trying to get VPP performance number for 20.01. But
master/latest data wo
Thanks Dave.
Can you please point me to any document to refer to CLI commands associated
with perfmon.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 12:51 PM Dave Barach (dbarach)
wrote:
> It’s an on-demand performance monitor controlled by a set of debug CLI
> commands. It doesn’t anything unless enabled, and it c
Cheat sheet:
“show pmc events”
Start traffic
“set pmc events ”
[example: “set pmc events instructions-per-clock”]
Show results:
“show pmc [verbose]”
Clear counters:
“clear pmc”
HTH... Dave
From: Nagaraju Vemuri
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 4:12 PM
To: Dave Barach (dbarach)
Cc: vpp-dev@li
Hi Ole,
If that is the case, then why is the following configuration allowed ?
nat44 deterministic add in 20.20.20.2/32 out 10.10.10.15/32
nat44 deterministic add in 40.40.40.2/32 out 10.10.10.15/32
With the above two commands, I am trying to map two internal-src-ip-addresses
to one external-sr
Something has always bothered me about my understanding of VPPs use of the term
"vector" and "vectors". When I think of Vector Packet Processing I think of
processing a vector (array) of packets in a single call to a node. The code,
though, then seems to refer to the individual packets as "vecto
Hmmm, yeah. Been at this for years, I can’t really remember when we settled on
e.g. n_vectors vs. n_vector_elts or some such.
In new code, it’s perfectly fair to use whatever names seem fit for purpose.
Vlib would be happy doing image processing, or any other kind of vector
processing. There’s
Hi All,
I have to write configuration data from a VPP client to VPP main thread.
What is the best way to do this?
Do I need to use memif channel to main thread or do I need to use VPP API or
any other method?
Thanks,
Subhasis Mohapatra
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent
23 matches
Mail list logo
