Hi,
I have one question related to VCL library.
Can i use the VCL library api for writing internal application?
Thank you,
Kusuma
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#15516): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/15516
Mute This Topic:
Hello,
Where can I find any example of usage l3xconns via `vppctl`?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#15517): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/15517
Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/71533312/21656
Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...
Coverity run failed today.
Current number of outstanding issues are 6
Newly detected: 1
Eliminated: 7
More details can be found at
https://scan.coverity.com/projects/fd-io-vpp/view_defects
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#15518): ht
Hi Kusuma,
No. For that you’ll have to use the builtin C apis. See the example echo
client/server, http server or proxy apps here [1].
Regards,
Florin
[1] https://git.fd.io/vpp/tree/src/plugins/hs_apps
> On Feb 25, 2020, at 2:55 AM, Kusuma DS wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have one question relate
Hi Florin,
Thank you for the information. I'll try it out.
Regards,
Kusuma
On Tue, 25 Feb, 2020, 8:27 PM Florin Coras, wrote:
> Hi Kusuma,
>
> No. For that you’ll have to use the builtin C apis. See the example echo
> client/server, http server or proxy apps here [1].
>
> Regards,
> Florin
>
>
I've got a couple of changes to the ipsec API that I'd like to upstream to
match the vpp "kernel" code I'm going try and upstream to strongswan.
1) Add: Add an ip_route_lookup/reply pair (semver minor++)
2) Fix: Add IS_INBOUND flag (value 0x40) to ipsec_sad_flags (semver patch++)
optional) Fix: p
[Edited Message Follows]
VPP IPsec responder on ESXI VM RHEL 7.6
Is there a limitation on the number of num-tx-queues and num-rx-queues we can
associate with vmxnet3? I have 12 worker threads running but when i try to
associate more than 4 num-rx-queues i get error saying "vmxnet3 failed to
ac
Hi Denis,
You can always use the help function on the CLI;
DBGvpp# l3xc ?
l3xc l3xc [add|del] via ...
an example would then be:
l3xc add ip4 eth1 via 10.10.10.10 eth0
to send all IP4 packets received on eth1 to 10.10.10.10 on eth0.
/neale
From: on be
strongswan conf
config setup
strictcrlpolicy=no
conn %default
ike=aes256-sha1-modp2048!
esp=aes192-sha1-esn!
mobike=no
keyexchange=ikev2
ikelifetime=24h
lifetime=24h
conn net-net
right=192.168.4.2
rightsubnet=192.168.5.0/24
rig
Dear Chris,
Adding missing flags to ipsec_sad_flags shouldn’t break much of anything. Never
say never, but for me, I wouldn’t hesitate to merge such a patch.
Adding an entirely new message will renumber subsequent core engine messages,
and implies client recompilation. My $0.02: again, not such
From: on behalf of "ravinder.ya...@hughes.com"
Date: Tuesday, February 25, 2020 at 7:27 AM
To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Subject: [vpp-dev] vmxnet3 rx-queue error "vmxnet3 failed to activate dev error
1" #vmxnet3 #ipsec
[Edited Message Follows]
VPP IPsec responder on ESXI VM RHEL 7.6
Is there
With my 19.08 release manager hat on,
For the current state of the matters my view is “as soon as the CRC of any
existing messages does not change, a patch is okay to include into 19.08”.
This applies recursively, meaning that if one add a new message to 1908, it
comes in as “frozen” with no fur
> On Feb 25, 2020, at 12:48 PM, Andrew Yourtchenko wrote:
>
> With my 19.08 release manager hat on,
> For the current state of the matters my view is “as soon as the CRC of any
> existing messages does not change, a patch is okay to include into 19.08”.
>
> This applies recursively, meaning t
> On 25 Feb 2020, at 21:11, Christian Hopps wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Feb 25, 2020, at 12:48 PM, Andrew Yourtchenko wrote:
>>
>> With my 19.08 release manager hat on,
>> For the current state of the matters my view is “as soon as the CRC of any
>> existing messages does not change, a patch is ok
> On Feb 25, 2020, at 3:44 PM, Andrew 👽 Yourtchenko wrote:
>
> That’s the APIs in the master prior to the API freeze, in my book.
>
> The today’s situation is:
>
> - want bleeding edge features ? Use master.
> - want sort-of-boring-stability ? Use release branch
>
> Now, I am really interest
Hello,
I'm trying to get an idea of TLS throughput using openssl without hardware
acceleration, and I'm using the vpp_echo application as follows:
* *Server :* taskset --cpu-list 4,6,8 ./vpp_echo socket-name /tmp/vpp-api.sock
uri tls://10.0.0.71/ fifo-size 200 uni RX=50Gb TX=0 stats 1 s
> On 25 Feb 2020, at 22:09, Christian Hopps wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Feb 25, 2020, at 3:44 PM, Andrew 👽 Yourtchenko wrote:
>>
>> That’s the APIs in the master prior to the API freeze, in my book.
>>
>> The today’s situation is:
>>
>> - want bleeding edge features ? Use master.
>> - want sort-o
Hi folks,
I am trying to build VPP netlink and router plugins based on vpp branch v20.01
to integrate and run with routing control plane FRR. I am following the
guidelines based on
https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/wiki/Alternate-forwarding-planes:-VPP
I am finding issues while trying to compil
Hi Dom,
First of all, tls code is not optimized and there are some scheduling
inefficiencies that we are aware of and which do affect overall performance.
Having said that, you might be able to improve throughput by increasing rx and
tx buffer sizes (any reason for keeping them that small?).
I've got a (hopefully) interesting problem with locking in VPP.
I need to add some cleanup code to my IPTFS additions to ipsec. Basically I
have some per-SA queues that I need to cleanup when an SA is deleted.
- ipsec only deletes it's SAs when its "fib_node" locks reach zero.
- I hoping this me
Hi Florin,
Thank you for your response. I used different rx/tx buffer sizes and it didn't
really make a difference. For this stage, it's good enough to know that there
are known performance limitations, thank you again for your help.
Regards,
Dom
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all m
Hi Kausik,
Did you run:
make install-ext-dep
/neale
From: on behalf of "Majumdar, Kausik"
Date: Tuesday 25 February 2020 at 23:35
To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Cc: "vppsb-...@lists.fd.io" , "Majumdar, Kausik"
Subject: [vpp-dev] VPP Plugins build errors from IPSec module
Hi folks,
I am try
Hi Neale,
Thanks for your reply! Yes, now I have compiled vpp v20.01 codebase, built rpm
package and installed it. The vpp process comes up. Currently, the built errors
are bit different, netlink lib built is failing. Also, I see the same issue
being discussed earlier in the vpp-dev mailing al
I am not sure how accurate / current the information from the wiki is.
However looks like you are missing the Intel Multi-buffer Crypto Library.
Try a `make install-ext-deps`, then wipe and rebuild.
Ray K
On 25/02/2020 22:34, Majumdar, Kausik wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
>
>
> I am trying to buil
24 matches
Mail list logo
