Hi Yao,
As per test_sctp.py the command is:
test echo server appns 0 fifo-size 4 [URI]
Where URI is made up as: sctp://IP/PORT
Please, take a look at "test/test_sctp.py" to see also the client side of it.
HTH,Marco
On Wed, 2018-11-07 at 15:01 +, Yao, Chengqiang wrote:
> Hi Macro,
>
> I use f
Hi Macro,
I follow test_sctp.py to use following commands in server and client, but
client can not connect server with an error printed “echo_client_node_fn:238:
stuck clients” as you can see below.
Do I miss any command ?
Server:
vpp# set int ip address FortyGigabitEthernet18/0/1 192.168.60.7
hello Ole,
yes, we have a control plane, and the protocols I mentioned below run in the
control plane.
when these protocols want to send packets, they organize their own protocol
data then call inet raw socket to set the IP header and link header. when
received a packet from the interface, fir
Still waiting on this.
Can anyone help me on this one?
-Original Message-
From: Muhammad Alp Arslan (alp.ars...@xflowresearch.com)
[mailto:alp.ars...@xflowresearch.com]
Sent: Friday, November 2, 2018 4:07 PM
To: 'Ni, Hongjun'; 'vpp-dev@lists.fd.io'
Subject: RE: [vpp-dev] PPPoE plugin doc
Dear Yao,
First of all, are you on MASTER branch or some other release?
Second, can you run "make test TEST=test_sctp.py" and see if that works for you?
It all looks good on my side and on Jenkins.
If you are interested in running multiple clients, you can do that by editing
test_sctp.py and add "n
Hi Macro,
I’m running on master branch and latest version.
“make test TEST-test_sctp.py” also works for me. I want to benchmark the
performance of sctp, but fifo-size is only 4 in test_sctp.py, so the throughput
is only ~2Gbps. If I increase the fifo-size in test_sctp.py, then the test
fails.
In view of significant code contributions to the vpp project - see below - I'm
pleased to nominate Andrew Yourtchenko as a vpp project committer. I have high
confidence that he'll be a major asset to the project in a committer role.
Andrew has contributed 181 merged patches, including signific
Hi alp arslan,
It works in my server.
Below is my configuration:
vpp# set int state TenGigabitEthernet5/0/0 up
vpp# set int ip table TenGigabitEthernet5/0/0 0
vpp# set int ip address TenGigabitEthernet5/0/0 100.1.1.3/32
vpp#
vpp# set int state TenGigabitEthernet5/0/1 up
vpp# set int ip table Te
+1
--
Damjan
> On 8 Nov 2018, at 13:13, Dave Barach via Lists.Fd.Io
> wrote:
>
> In view of significant code contributions to the vpp project - see below -
> I'm pleased to nominate Andrew Yourtchenko as a vpp project committer. I have
> high confidence that he'll be a major asset to the pr
On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 11:59 +, Yao, Chengqiang wrote:
> Hi Macro,
>
>
>
> I’m running on master branch and latest version.
>
>
>
> “make test TEST-test_sctp.py” also works for me. I want to benchmark the
> performance of sctp, but fifo-size is only 4 in test_sctp.py,
> so the throughpu
+1
On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 12:13 +, Dave Barach via Lists.Fd.Io wrote:
> In view of significant code contributions to the vpp project - see below - I'm
> pleased to nominate Andrew Yourtchenko as a vpp project committer. I have high
> confidence that he'll be a major asset to the project in a co
+1
Dave
-Original Message-
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Dave Barach via
Lists.Fd.Io
Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 7:14 AM
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: [vpp-dev] New Committer Nomination: Andrew Yourtchenko
In view of significant code contributi
+1
-Message d'origine-
De : au nom de "Dave Barach via Lists.Fd.Io"
Répondre à : "Dave Barach (dbarach)"
Date : jeudi 8 novembre 2018 à 13:13
À : "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Cc : "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io"
Objet : [vpp-dev] New Committer Nomination: Andrew Yourtchenko
In view of significan
+1
On 11/8/2018 7:13 AM, Dave Barach via Lists.Fd.Io wrote:
In view of significant code contributions to the vpp project - see below - I'm
pleased to nominate Andrew Yourtchenko as a vpp project committer. I have high
confidence that he'll be a major asset to the project in a committer role.
Hi TSC members,
Our Initial code has been refactored and gone through internal legal review.
How can we submit the code to the fd.io Foundation for IPR Review?
Thanks,
Hongjun
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Ni, Hongjun
Sent: Thursday, November 8, 2018 12:04
+1
Florin
> On Nov 8, 2018, at 4:13 AM, Dave Barach via Lists.Fd.Io
> wrote:
>
> In view of significant code contributions to the vpp project - see below -
> I'm pleased to nominate Andrew Yourtchenko as a vpp project committer. I have
> high confidence that he'll be a major asset to the pro
+1
-Original Message-
From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Dave Barach via
Lists.Fd.Io
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2018 7:14 AM
To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Cc: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Subject: [vpp-dev] New Committer Nomination: Andrew Yourtchenko
In view of significant code contributions to
+1
On 11/8/18, 07:17, "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io on behalf of Dave Barach via
Lists.Fd.Io"
wrote:
In view of significant code contributions to the vpp project - see below -
I'm pleased to nominate Andrew Yourtchenko as a vpp project committer. I have
high confidence that he'll be a major asse
Hi guys,
I unfortunately missed this. Yes, the fifo size provided is the number of kB
and yes you should be able to do 4MB (fifo-size 4096) or even higher.
The “stuck clients” warning is just a notification, the test can still finish.
To make sure you give the test enough time, add “test-time
Hi,
If I hand-construct an IP datagram (bigger than mtu) using chained
vlib buffers and send this chain to ip4-lookup, would that be
fragmented and sent out as per the mtu requirements of the interface
from which the packet is determined to be sent out ? (assume that the
rx and tx sw_if_index is p
> On 8 Nov 2018, at 23:26, Prashant Upadhyaya wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> If I hand-construct an IP datagram (bigger than mtu) using chained
> vlib buffers and send this chain to ip4-lookup, would that be
> fragmented and sent out as per the mtu requirements of the interface
> from which the packet is
Hi Ole,
Thanks for the information.
Suppose my IP datagram gets fragmented into fragments F.1 and F.2, do
these again get submitted to ip4-input ?
I am trying to figure out the path in the graph from the time I submit
my v4 IP datagram to ip4-lookup.
What is crucial for me to know is if the fragm
Well, folks there's something strange here...
I was trying to understand what's going on with SCTP and (because I couldn't see
the light) I decided to give TCP a try.
I hence modified test_tcp.py to have 500 mbytes to send and the test fails.
Similarly to what happens for SCTP. I did try to increas
Hi Marco,
So echo test with 500MB does finish and reports throughput after 15s but with
warnings of the type “clients stuck”?
Note that we also have tests that run iperf3 for about 5s and those exchange GB
of data probably.
Florin
> On Nov 8, 2018, at 12:55 PM, Marco Varlese wrote:
>
> We
It finishes with errors (stating 3 tests failed). Same behavior as seen with
SCTP so I'm now guessing that's rather an issue with the test code (either
client or server) or with the session layer (doubt that since VCL works)??
Thoughts?
Marco VarleseOn Nov 8, 2018 22:06, Florin Coras wrote:
>
Hm, I suspect in case of TCP it may be an overlap between unit tests and the
throughput test. I’ve separated them here. Can you try it out with 500M
locally? It works fine on my box, but maybe it has to do with the hardware it
runs on.
Thanks,
Florin
[1] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/15833/
>
Dear VPP’ers,
This message may be of interest to you.
Jerome
De : Naveen Joy
Répondre à : "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Date : jeudi 8 novembre 2018 à 23:05
À : openstack-dev
Objet : [openstack-dev] networking-vpp 18.10 for VPP 18.10 is now available
Hello All
Prashant,
> On 9 Nov 2018, at 01:39, Prashant Upadhyaya wrote:
>
> Hi Ole,
>
> Thanks for the information.
>
> Suppose my IP datagram gets fragmented into fragments F.1 and F.2, do
> these again get submitted to ip4-input ?
> I am trying to figure out the path in the graph from the time I subm
Hi all,
Sweetcomb project has been approved by FD.io TSC.
And project creation has been completed.
Thank you all for your great help to make this happen!
Below is the project resource:
Committers group: fdio-gerrit-sweetcomb-committers Invites sent to the initial
committers:
https://wi
29 matches
Mail list logo
